Climate change in free speech are on trial in a DC courtroom.

On the one side is Michael Mann, a leading climate scientist whose hockey stick graft propelled

an anti-fossil fuel movement.

On the other side is Mark Stein, a writer and free speech campaigner. Stein has denounced the hockystick graph as a scientific fraud.

This climate change trial will determine if it's okay to accuse a scientist of fraud and if free speech still exists in America.

We're investigative journalists, Ann McElheney and Phelum McElier, and we're producing a daily podcast,

Climate Change on Trial.

With verbatim reenactments of the day's testimony, we'll bring you a courtroom drama every morning in your inbox.

You'll hear the day's arguments thrashed out and the lies exposed as they happen.

Find climate change on trial, wherever you get your podcasts.

Your future may very well depend upon it.

Stu, what do you think the most impressive point that I made today was? I mean there's so many to choose from today's podcast.

I thought you were a passionate 45 minute rant on the inequities of the Oscar not going to

Margot Robbie for Barbie.

You know I didn't think I didn't think anybody heard that.

I mean I didn't do that but I oh my gosh you I could you I could

feel there's a real injustice there that's so deep with me we talk about about a lot of things. We talked about the border today.

A lot about the audio from Carrie Lake that just drives me out of my mind. That is so

immoral and you know if you want the moral high ground you should call

the GOP and say enough that guy should not be the head of the GOP in Arizona and

if you don't know what we're talking about you

need to find out and it's right at the beginning of the podcast but that goes all

...