Welcome to the podcast. Today we spent a good amount of time on the Derek Chauvin trial talking about what's going to happen and how it's going to happen. What are the charges actually look like here?

Does who's done a good job, the prosecution or the defense?

We talked to Andrew Branca, who makes a case about the idea that maybe the jury might consider not coming back with a guilty verdict.

You know what that looks like, it's not going to be a pretty picture. We also talked about Maxine Waters and her latest bit of crazy.

And how about the left continually saying the Georgia laws and other voting laws are like the Jim Crow laws? What were the Jim Crow laws really like?

What, I mean, this is incredibly offensive to someone who actually had to deal with Jim Crow laws. We go through all of that today on the podcast. Make sure to subscribe to BlazeTV.com slash Glenn. The promo code is Glenn.

You can get 10 bucks off your subscription to BlazeTV there and take a minute, click subscribe to this podcast and click on over to Stu DoesAmerica that podcast as well. New episodes for free every single day. Just click subscribe and check it out. Here's the podcast.

You're listening to the best of the perfect program.

Can you imagine being a juror in this Chauvin trial? I mean, what is it that you're going through? Have you ever been on a jury before for anything important to?

I went through jury selection on a health care trial. Once they found out that I worked with Glenn Beck, they were not interested anymore in me serving on the jury.

Yeah, it's a you, hey, easiest way everyone out there. If you're ever wanting to get out of a jury, jury duty, just say you work with Glenn Beck. You are clear they do not want you anywhere near the jury. Well, actually, one side really did once I was like, yeah, yeah, no, this guy seems pretty good. The other one's like, I absolutely not.

I went through the jury selection for a jury on an attempted murder and the prosecution knew exactly who I was, but the defense had no idea.

And when the when the defense said, yeah, I'm okay with this with this juror. The judge kind of looked at me, then looked at the prosecution and then looked at the other guy went, okay.

So, I mean, good luck. But, you know, we really tried to be fair and it was, I think it was an attempted murder charge. And it was really frustrating because we couldn't, we couldn't get the background of this guy.

And we called the judge in several times or sent for clarification on things several times and it kept coming back can't tell you that can't tell you that.

And so you had to, I mean, you got told you one thing, but the evidence wasn't there and it was, it was arguable evidence and it was really very difficult to come to a decision. It was really hard.

Imagine this one. You're also weighing my city is going to be burned down.

Yeah, I don't think it's hard if you are thinking, okay, this guy's guilty, he did it. We're going to, we're going to convict him of everything.

That's probably pretty easy because you're going to think of yourself probably as a hero. And, and that's understandable.

No, but, way way text because that, but wait, if you, if that's what you think, I mean, this is how the media has played this, right? Like this is a evil cop versus innocent person sort of thing.

I don't think, I don't think you're taking into consideration when it comes down to 12 people in a room. Hopefully you're, you're not going in with just that arrogance.

Or at least when you get in there, you now have to sit down with, with 11 other people and you have to have a conversation and go, well, wait a minute, though, I, I don't see it that way. Because what about this and this? And you're going over the testimony and you're really picking it apart.

...