This is an I-Heart podcast.

You're listening to Fox Sports Radio.

Well, let's start with those Tennessee Titans.

They go on the road.

2816 victory over the Rams, Ryan Tannahill, outplaying Matthew Stafford by a long shot in this one.

Now, Tannahill has been one of the critics, especially the analytics critics, darling.

Now, the debate has been, is it just causes the play action?

And the old school was you got to establish the run.

What would the advanced analytics people say is, no, no, no, no.

As long as that run is a possibility, they're going to have to account for it, and thus the play action works.

But when you have the best running back, perhaps, you know, you could make the case.

I mean, what is it, Adrian Peterson in his prime and Henry?

And, I mean, there's really no other conversation. Is there for any extended period of time? I mean, we're not talking fantasy and tomless. I'm saying a back that's winning your games, winning your playoff games. Those are the two, right? That's it. And then in the prior century, Barry Sanders, or in prior

decade, I guess century, but yeah, in the 90s, Barry Sanders and Emmett, right? That's about it.

And so Henry's one of the four best backs of the last 30 years? I think that's fair to say.

You make an argument for you. How do you argue against it? Who was you putting in there? I think Tomlinson, to say he's just a fantasy guy, is kind of... I'm saying it was, what, a two and a half year? I mean, it was a flash. If we were talking high heights, maybe, but if we're talking any extended period of time.

Okay.

But what I'm saying is one of the best of the last 30 years and able, in the most dominant by far,

and the only real dominant back that isn't about catching passes as a big chunk of it in the modern era.

If you say from 2011 on and say if all you could have was this back running the ball,

no pass catching.

Meaning if it was not considered, we're ranking by running.

...