Welcome to the Freedom Hot. This is the best of Buck Daily Podcast. The top stories of the day from the Buck Sexton Show.

For more Buck, head to Bucksexton.com and remember to subscribe to the podcast.

Welcome friends to the Buck Sexton Show. We are 22 days out from the election. And in some ways it really doesn't feel like it does it.

Not nearly the same kind of frenzy of political activity out on the streets.

We don't have lawns in New York City so I can't speak to lawn signs but everyone's still locked up inside.

Things are getting colder. People are worried about COVID. And this week we're going to spend really on a Supreme Court nomination battle.

There's going to be something of a respite from the main effort of the election for a few days.

And we've already seen what the opposition to Amy Coney Barrett looks like so far. And the answer is it is unbelievably weak.

I mean it's really quite pathetic. You saw this over the weekend. You had a number of prominent news sites that started doing one of two things.

They either changed the definition of court packing to include this, right, which is filling a Supreme Court seat. No, that's that's court packing. No, that's called filling a seat. That's not packing.

Or they started to use this phrase, de-politicize the court.

De-politicize Supreme Court nominations. What the heck does that even mean? Well, that's what you do when you don't have a real argument. That's what you do when you're flailing.

And clearly the Democrats are at this point. What are they going to say? The incredibly brilliant, universally beloved mother of seven who adopted two black children from Haiti.

And has already been through a Senate confirmation process to be an appeals court judge and was just pushed through without really any issue other than being asked as the dogman, the dogman lives loudly within you, which was great for conservatives, Catholics and Republicans that that question was out there.

But she's already been confirmed to that. Why would she not be confirmed here? They have no argument friends. They lost. This is nothing but sour grapes, sore loserism from Democrats. That's all it is. They have no other argument.

History is with the Republicans filling this seat. Common sense, basic politics, elections have consequences. The single truest and most useful phrase that Barack Obama ever uttered, I think, at least as president.

Elections do have consequences. And we are seeing right now what that can mean. So far it has been pretty pathetic watching Democrats dance around the full on assault on Amy Coney Barrett's character that we all kind of know is coming.

We all believe that they'll do something completely disgraceful or disreputable here. That's their only option. What else are they going to say?

ACB. And I refer to her that way because it's convenient, but also because it really triggers the lives. They hate that. She's no RBG. Correct. She's not.

And for the purposes of a constitution list on the court, that's a great thing. That's a great thing.

But they're going after everything around this moment so far. They're trying to set the stage and set the narrative. You had Democrat senators spend the day talking about how important the Affordable Care Act is.

Senators talking about how Donald Trump has done a terrible job on COVID. These things have nothing to do with ACB. Nothing.

...