Barr weaponizes the Justice Department to investigate Trump’s baseless fraud claims
The Daily 202's Big Idea
The Washington Post
4.6 • 1.1K Ratings
🗓️ 10 November 2020
⏱️ 14 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Good morning. I'm James Holman from the Washington Post and this is the Daily |
| 0:06.0 | 202 for Tuesday, November 10th. In today's news, the Secretary of Defense's |
| 0:12.0 | termination underscores President Trump's |
| 0:14.8 | insistence on absolute loyalty. The chair of the Democratic |
| 0:18.9 | Congressional Campaign Committee steps aside after heavy losses, and Pfizer's vaccine could be cleared by mid |
| 0:26.7 | December. But first the big idea. Attorney General Bill Barr gave federal prosecutors the green light on Monday |
| 0:37.6 | to pursue any allegations of vote tabulation irregularities before results are certified. |
| 0:45.2 | He indicated that he has already done so in a few specific instances. |
| 0:49.7 | This major reversal of longstanding Justice Department policy drew widespread internal and external criticism |
| 0:58.0 | because it fuels unfounded claims of massive election fraud being pushed by Donald Trump. |
| 1:05.6 | Richard Pilger, the head of the Justice Department's election crimes branch, |
| 1:10.2 | stepped down from his position in protest over Barr's latest directive. |
| 1:16.0 | Sources tell Matt Zapatowski and Devlin Barrett that Barr first broached a similar idea some weeks ago and political leadership in the Justice |
| 1:25.1 | Department's criminal division of which the election crimes branches |
| 1:27.9 | apart pushed back hard. These same officials were blindsided last night when Barr's two-page memo went out. |
| 1:37.0 | Pilger emailed colleagues, quote, |
| 1:39.0 | Having familiarized myself with this new policy and its ramifications, I must regretfully resign. |
| 1:45.0 | Bar seemed to take aim at previous guidance from the Justice |
| 1:50.1 | Department's election crimes branch that said prosecutors should not in most instances |
| 1:54.2 | take overt steps in voter fraud or related investigations until after election results are in |
| 1:59.4 | and certified. This guidance was designed to ensure that voters and state and local election officials, rather than the federal government, get to decide the results, and that if prosecutors wanted to deviate from that norm, |
| 2:13.3 | they would at least first have to consult with public integrity prosecutors in the |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Washington Post, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Washington Post and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

