All right, Alexander, let's talk about the situation in Bangladesh.

We did get a coup.

That's the way it looks.

Actually, the coup prime minister has said it was a U.S. coup.

So she's come out and said it was a coup.

The United States denies that it was a coup in Bangladesh.

But we do have an interim prime

minister, Eunice, who does appear to be a type of Juan Guaido character for the United States,

someone who comes from their side of things, who's gone through the process that they put leaders through in order to put them

into leadership roles in other governments. So we have him in place. And we have some

indication, at least from the Kud Prime Minister as to what all of this was about. Basically,

this was about control of the Bay of Bengal.

And obviously, this is something that India and China will probably have to address

if this was indeed what the coup was about.

Yeah, I think I'm absolutely sure that this was a coup. It's, I mean, if you want to

look at the sort of, you know, the way it was set up, I mean, Brian Bellettic has done a good

program about this on his channel, but I mean, I've no doubt it was a coup. And all you have, all you have

to do is look at the person who's taken over. Eunice is somebody with a very, very long connection to the United States, going all the way back to the 1960s. He is very strongly pro-American. He's very hostile, but to India and China.

And the whole way in which the events were executed is just very consistent with the whole colour revolution format.

Protests by young people, students as they call.

Many of them are, of course, students.

But, you know but protests about them,

...