meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Nature Podcast

Backchat: March 2017

Nature Podcast

podcast@nature.com

Science, Technology, News

4.5893 Ratings

🗓️ 23 March 2017

⏱️ 23 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

A sting operation finds several predatory journals offered to employ a fictional, unqualified academic as an editor. Plus, the Great Barrier Reef in hot water, and trying to explain 'time crystals'.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello and welcome to Backchat. If the Nature podcast is a well-managed and tranquil aquarium, then Backchat is feeding time at the zoo.

0:09.0

Our menagerie of topics this month includes predatory journals, the prognosis for coral, and a rare species called a time crystal.

0:17.5

And no, most reporters who covered that didn't know what it was either.

0:21.4

I'm Kerry Smith, and here are my three rare and exotic fauna. Hello, Kerry. I'm Lizzie Gibney. I am

0:26.9

a reporter here in London. I cover physics and astronomy. Hello everyone. I'm Daniel

0:31.6

Cressy. I'm another reporter here in London. And I'm Monia Baker. I'm a editor in San Francisco.

0:38.1

Lovely. Thanks, everyone. Now, coming up in the show, nice work if you can fake it. A completely

0:43.8

made-up scientist gets given editing positions at a rather long list of journals with questionable

0:49.2

acceptance standards. The Great Barrier Reef is in peril, bleaching for the second year in a row due to warmer

0:55.8

ocean temperatures. So what is in its future? And at the end of the show, we get familiar with

1:01.4

time crystals, just one of the many scientific phrases that sound cooler to the average person

1:05.9

than perhaps they actually are. Now, firstly, Monia, to you and the results of a sting operation that you're

1:12.6

publishing this week. Well, it started with four researchers at the University of Rocklow in Poland.

1:18.9

They were getting annoyed by all these invitations they were getting from journals that had

1:24.3

nothing to do with their field of research. So a predatory journal is a journal that does not care about quality

1:30.8

and is publishing articles just to collect fees from authors.

1:35.0

They don't provide peer review or other quality assurances that they say they do.

1:39.7

So these authors decided that they were going to try to catch the predators out. They made up a scientist.

1:49.1

Her name is Anna Osust, and that means Anna Afrod in Polish. They made up her CV. They made her

1:57.4

fairly unqualified to be an editor at a journal,

2:01.2

and then they popped off an email requesting an editor position at 360 journals.

2:07.3

120 had been named as predators by a librarian in Colorado,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from podcast@nature.com, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of podcast@nature.com and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.