meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Avoidable 'Fiscal Cliffs' Foster Uncertainty

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 3 December 2012

⏱️ 7 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Monday, December 3rd, 2012.

0:07.0

I'm Caleb Brown. The fiscal cliff is coming in its very existence as a probable scenario creates uncertainty destructive to our

0:15.4

economy. So says Michael Munger, professor of economics and political science at

0:19.7

Duke University, we spoke last week.

0:25.0

What do you think is the most important element that is missing from the discussion

0:30.4

about this fiscal cliff, these rising tax rates and so-called spending cuts.

0:36.4

They're actually quite meager, but what is the most important element missing

0:39.6

from the debate? Well I think of the hypocrisy of both parties in Congress is what I find

0:45.2

astonishing. The reason that we're having economic problems is not that we're

0:50.0

not sure what spending is going to be or what taxes are. It's uncertainty.

0:55.1

So the problem that business people have is they're not sure what tax rates are going to be

1:00.0

operating under. They're not sure what government programs are going to

1:03.1

continue. They're not they don't know if if you're a defense contractor you're not

1:07.1

sure if that contract is going to extend into the future you're not going to hire

1:10.2

anybody. So we need to pick something and settle on it. The problem is that

1:16.2

politicians and I guess you can't blame them in a way you can't blame a dog

1:19.7

reading out of the garbage these are the incentives that we create. In order to get

1:24.0

reelected you need to be crucial. And so the simplest example I can think of is the

1:28.5

minimum wage. Why don't we just index the minimum wage? Apparently there's some

1:32.0

agreement. We need a minimum wage. We don't

1:34.7

index it. That way every three, four, five years one side can say we're going to

1:40.5

come to you and save the minimum wage. We're going to raise it. And the other side can say,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.