4.9 • 876 Ratings
🗓️ 1 August 2025
⏱️ 30 minutes
🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS
🧾️ Download transcript
Exercise and CV outcomes, aldosterone modulation, AI for ECG reading, GLP-1 comparisons, end-of-life decisions, and another well-meaning policy that caused harm in veterans are discussed by John Mandrola, MD, in this week’s podcast.
This podcast is intended for healthcare professionals only.
To read a partial transcript or to comment, visit:
https://www.medscape.com/twic
I Exercise and CV outcomes
II Aldosterone Modulation in Cardio-Kidney Disease
III AI vs MD ECG-Reading for Cath Lab Activation
IV Tirzepatide vs Dulaglutide - SURPASS CVOT Study
V End-of-Life Decisions
Doctors’ Own End-of-Life Choices Defy Common Medical Practice
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/doctors-own-end-life-choices-defy-common-medical-practice-2025a1000k01
VI Well-Meaning Policies That Make Sense
Â
You may also like:
The Bob Harrington Show with the Stephen and Suzanne Weiss Dean of Weill Cornell Medicine, Robert A. Harrington, MD. https://www.medscape.com/author/bob-harrington
Questions or feedback, please contact [email protected]
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | You're listening to This Week in Cardiology from the heart.org, Medscape Cardiology. |
0:05.7 | This podcast is intended for health care professionals only. |
0:08.8 | Any views expressed are the presenters' own and do not necessarily reflect the views of WebMD or Medscape. |
0:14.6 | Hi, everyone. |
0:15.8 | This is John Mandrola from the Heart.org, Medscape Cardiology, and this is this week in cardiology for August 1st, |
0:23.5 | 2025. This week, exercise in cardiovascular outcomes, aldosterone modulation, AI for ECG reading, |
0:33.4 | GLP1 comparisons, end-of-life decisions, and yet another well-meaning policy that caused substantial |
0:41.1 | harm this time in U.S. veterans. First, listener feedback. My former partner, Anthony Pearson, |
0:50.1 | an ecocardiographer, super smart person, and blogger known as a skeptical cardiologist, |
0:55.8 | wrote to me about my comments last week on exercise. He wrote, quote, |
1:02.0 | I was shocked to hear you quote, major guidelines and numerous observational studies to support |
1:06.6 | the concept that physical activity lowers cardiovascular death, etc. I was even more shocked to hear you |
1:12.9 | discussed a 10,000 step study. Again, it's purely observational data as if the higher step counts |
1:19.5 | were reducing your CV death rate, etc. John, have you looked at the RCTs in this area? Why do you have such intense blinders on when it comes to critical analysis of the data supporting exercise and physical activity? |
1:33.3 | You don't have to answer. I know why. |
1:36.3 | The logic is that exercise is good. It's good for me. People should exercise more. |
1:42.3 | We can't possibly critique the epidemiologic data that establishes |
1:46.0 | the CB health benefits because that people might exercise less. At the very least, you should |
1:52.1 | throw in a limitation statement when quoting these types of study. Non-sedentarily yours, he signs. |
1:59.2 | I love this comment. |
2:04.5 | Indeed, the empirical evidence for exercise is weak to non-existent. |
2:09.3 | It would be nearly impossible to study lifelong exercise and cardiovascular outcomes. |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in 25 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Medscape Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Medscape Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.