Hi, I'm Rob. And I'm Rob. And this is Ask Rob and Rob.

Welcome to Ask Rob and Rob. It's the show where we answer your property questions. And the show, of course, starts with you. So we like to make it really simple for you to send your questions our way.

We do head over to Property Hub.net forward slash ask. That's property hub.

Dot net forward slash ask.

There, you can leave us a message.

You can call us and leave a voicemail if you prefer.

Or if you want to write in with your question,

we have our wonderful column in the Sunday Times each and every Sunday in the home section.

So if you want to get your question in that way,

you can as well. First up, we've got a question in from Matt.

Hey, Rob and Rob. It's Matt here from Studley. Huge fan. Been listening to the podcast pretty much

since the start. Bought the books. I've been featured in the magazine. Like I say, I'm a huge

fan. So thank you for everything you do. Had a quick question related to how property can fulfill the purpose of providing someone

with a pension effectively, especially for younger investors. Looking at some of the directions

of travel within the economy at the moment, I think it raises an interesting point for younger

investors. If we look at the average house I think it raises an interesting point for younger investors.

If we look at the average house price, call it 300,000, increasing at 4% a year, which isn't

too crazy. If it does that for the next 33 years, so I'm 32, that taking me up to 65, at that

point, that average house would be worth almost 1.1 million.

Now, in the backdrop of the fact that the economy certainly isn't growing at 4%, and neither are wages,

and neither are really keeping up with inflation, it does beg the question, how sustainable is that

level of growth? And if demand drops,

...