The

The Welcome to another episode of Conversations with Coleman.

If you're hearing this, then you're on the public feed,

which means you'll get episodes a week after they come out out and you'll hear advertisements. You can get access to the

subscriber feed by going to colemanhuees.org and becoming a supporter. This means you'll have

access to episodes a week early, you'll never hear ads, and you'll get access to bonus Q&A

episodes. You can also support me by liking and subscribing on YouTube

and sharing the show with friends and family. As always, thank you so much for your support.

Welcome to another episode of Conversations with Coleman. Today's episode is a Q&A where I answer

questions sent to me by supporters of the podcast.

Usually I only release these episodes to members only, but I'm releasing this one to the public because I felt the questions were particularly good.

If you have any burning questions you like to ask me, and if you'd like to be a part of the next members-only Q&A, you can join the Coleman Unfiltered Community and become a member today.

And you can do that by going to www.commonhuees.org slash unfiltered.

So with that said, let's get to the first question.

Question number one.

I'm interested to hear your opinion on the Citizens United decision of 2010 in the Supreme Court.

I have a theory that this corrupted politics an order of magnitude, at least by ensuring that

only candidates with millions of support in dollars from corporations would be able to participate

and virtually promises that when elected, and virtually promises that one, I think that's an error.

That when elected, candidates will have no choice but to act in a way that benefits the donors

that help them get elected. Do you agree with this assessment? Okay. So great question.

Citizens United, of course, was a decision made in 2010 by the Supreme Court to treat spending in political campaigns

...