meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Serious Inquiries Only

AS69: Is Sam Harris the Sexist Pig We're Looking For?

Serious Inquiries Only

Thomas Smith

News, News Commentary, Politics

4.61.1K Ratings

🗓️ 22 September 2014

⏱️ 61 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Sam Harris made some comments that feminists did not take kindly to. Here's a link to his explanation: http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/im-not-the-sexist-pig-youre-looking-for I think there are some troubling points to his commentary, and here are some critics: http://freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2014/09/12/sam-harris-is-just-factually-wrong-globally-atheism-has-no-gender-split/ http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2014/09/15/a-professional-responsibility-to-get-the-facts-straight/#more-20633 I find this one pretty outrageous though: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/another-week-another-atheist-demands-we-call-his-sexism-not-sexism-this-time-sam-harris/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+(The+Raw+Story) Amanda Marcotte writes this as though Sam Harris has said women … Continue reading AS69: Is Sam Harris the Sexist Pig We're Looking For?

The post AS69: Is Sam Harris the Sexist Pig We're Looking For? appeared first on Atheistically Speaking.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You're listening to, atheistically speaking. Oh, Hello everyone welcome to episode 70 minus 1 I'll just say of

0:38.1

atheistically speaking with your host Thomas Smith okay well lots to talk about. Let's see, how to even begin?

0:47.0

Well, I referenced on Facebook and make sure you're on the Facebook because that's where that's where the magic happens

0:53.9

now that's where you can get a first look at some sometimes I post things and then I

0:58.1

talk about them later so Facebook.com slash atheistly speaking.

1:03.0

But I think most of you are on there.

1:05.3

And I posted about, you've no doubt heard, Sam Harris and actually some more Richard Dawkins

1:12.1

related stuff. And I think I want to get into that first I want to read a very very good

1:21.6

pointed and and and well-taking comment that someone left that I think

1:26.9

raises a very valid concern.

1:29.9

Referring to the episodes with Tom and Cecil, cognitive dissonance, Chris with a K said,

1:39.0

I haven't listened to part two yet, so it's possible this was somehow addressed but I have a point about sorry I have to point out a bit of your own cognitive dissonance with the topic winky face

1:51.8

You are willing to take Dawkins and others targeted by

1:55.2

politically and socially progressive atheists at face value when they explain

1:59.4

themselves and don't assume ulterior motives or hidden subtext.

2:04.8

But then you call the angry atheists who call them out,

2:08.7

call him out for various comments contrarians.

2:11.9

And I'm mainly referring to sexist and racist comments,

2:15.0

not Down syndrome abortions.

2:17.0

Now, if the angry comments all basically boil down to insults or the like,

2:21.0

I'd be inclined to agree, but there has been many

2:24.8

a podcast and blog post outlining exactly why people are so angry about specific

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Thomas Smith, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Thomas Smith and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.