meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Serious Inquiries Only

AS266: Was Richard Carrier Wrong About Evo Psych?

Serious Inquiries Only

Thomas Smith

News, Atheism, Skepticism, Democrat, Left, Liberal, Politics, News Commentary, Progressive, Religion

4.61K Ratings

🗓️ 11 August 2016

⏱️ 49 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Here’s part 2 with Lindsey and her defense of evolutionary psychology against the incredibly critical attack featured on this show several months back. We get into even more interesting territory!

The post AS266: Was Richard Carrier Wrong About Evo Psych? appeared first on Atheistically Speaking.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You're listening to, atheistically speaking. Oh, Hello and welcome to atheistically speaking this is episode 266 and I'm your host Thomas Smith.

0:35.6

All right before we get to part two with Lindsay on Evo Psych, very interesting topic,

0:42.2

I just want to let my patrons know and anyone who is thinking about becoming a patron at

0:46.4

Patreon.com slash atheist that I've got a great bonus content with Eli.

0:50.4

It's going to be really, it's pretty funny. pretty funny.

0:53.0

We had a really interesting funny discussion.

0:55.0

And patrons will also get early access to a special announcement being made, and that's all say but so patrons get it early

1:06.7

that'll be out sometime this week and so if you want to check that out please feel free to check out the Patreon. All right here is

1:15.6

part two with Lindsay. There was a general theme that came up about the fact that we aren't testing theories.

1:35.0

That Evosike is not testing theories?

1:38.0

Yeah, that our methods don't lend themselves to actually testing theories.

1:43.0

There's a couple of things to be said about this.

1:45.0

Sure.

1:46.0

One is that in hypothesis testing,

1:50.0

or like when you're doing science,

1:52.0

it's true to say that a study does not

1:55.0

test a theory that is actually true but the way in which is true is not how it was

1:59.8

being presented I don't think. So a theory is like this broad general framework for synthesizing

2:09.4

a bunch of different observations. So like evolutionary theory, for instance, right? That's like a very

2:14.4

broad thing, right? A very broad set of principles that describes a whole lot of things. No individual

2:19.8

study is directly testing evolutionary theory.

2:24.0

Rather, we're deriving hypotheses and then from that predictions from this theory

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Thomas Smith, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Thomas Smith and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.