You're listening to, atheistically speaking. Oh, Hello and welcome to atheistically speaking this is episode 259 and I am your host

Thomas Smith.

All right here it is part two of the master class on the second amendment.

Everything you need to know and I bet you there's still some stuff,

plenty of stuff we didn't get to, but it's such a solid background of information for any,

to educate us going into any discussions of the Second Amendment going forward.

So really good stuff and here's part two. But could Congress act first or is DC Heller prevent a lot of that like, you know, before it starts?

How does that?

Great, again, great question.

I'm not saying that patronizing like, no, no're you're you're really focusing on these

issues when you bring a lawsuit you can bring a lawsuit that is based on either

either the law or a good faith-based modification to the law, right? A good faith argument for modifying

the law as it stands, right? And that is, that is a federal rule called Rule 11, and it prevents

lawyers from bringing lawsuits where they know, right, the law is settled as X, and there's no argument

that it's ever going to be not X.

And you know, it's a very serious issue to say to somebody, I think this violates Rule

11.

I don't think you have even a good argument to change the law. I would certainly be very very comfortable defending a

constitutional challenge to a congressional act that enacted, you know, that for example, that

reenacted the handgun ban in the District of Columbia of Columbia right like that that and and the argument would not be

the Supreme Court currently recognizes this because it clearly doesn't right it's good

There's a case that's to the exact opposite, but the argument would be, I have a good faith basis to believe that DC versus Heller was wrongly decided, and I would ask the Supreme Court to overturn that.

...