You're listening to, atheistically speaking. Oh, Hello and welcome to episode 162 of atheistically speaking.

I'm your host Thomas Smith.

All right, well, today we have part two of the interview with Justin Sheber about his new YouTube channel

Real A Theology but it's more than of course just a an interview about a

YouTube channel it's about the

argument involved and that he's talked about in his first video.

They're really cool and I think we got into some interesting territory so I'll go ahead and give you part two right now. Right. Right, so the mere argument there would be that, you know, would be you looking over

your cat for one particular flea and not seeing it initially and then inferring from

that probably there are no fleas on my cat. Now the problem with that of course is as you've said you've

Flee are assholes.

Yeah, because they're the kinds of things that you wouldn't expect to see necessarily.

So, in it all, I mean the argument really hinges on whether or not God's justifications are the kinds of things that we would have quote unquote

epistemic access to.

Whether or not they're the kinds of things we could see

or we could, that would be intuitive,

that would be kind of obvious to us, right?

Like for example, you know, when I see a child getting a shot by a doctor, the

justification in that instance is really obvious to me, right?

Clearly the doctor has good intentions, you know, his his doctor outfit very much implies the

reason the justification entailed in this situation, right? Yeah, unless he's an evil Nazi doctor or something.

Yeah, well, there's definitely that possibility, right?

But, so, you know, we're justified in infer referring that probably that doctor has a good reason for allowing that but

...