With a one-minute look at culture from a Christian worldview, I'm John Stonestreet with a point.

In 1884, a 31-year-old Quaker woman saw a treatment for infertility from Dr. William

Pancos.

She became the first woman to conceive and deliver a baby via artificial insemination,

which, in the words of bioethicisolizabeth Yuko, was an ethical nightmare.

After knocking her out with chloroform, Pancos impregnated the woman using the sperm of one

of the six medical students that was in attendance.

The rash were sworn to secrecy.

Only her husband was informed, both the woman and her child remained in the dark for 25

years until one of the students described what happened in a medical journal.

If this kind of malpractice seemed unfathomable today, recent cases in Vermont, Indiana,

Colorado, and Nevada involve other ethical problems beyond just the absence of consent,

like doctors using their own sperm.

Because a child's more than a product, procreation without relationship, robbed children

of the right to know their parents.

Other technologies cannot make an unethical practice any less unethical.

I'm John Stone Street.