You're talking points on?

Do we?

A few.

We understand that the PGMOL of knowledge that James Tocke's yellow card last night should have been changed to a red.

How do you react to that and what do you think of the effectiveness and consistency of VAR when the official bosses are turning around and question a big decision in a big game?

I think it's always good that if they think they've made a mistake that they acknowledge that.

And we all know that mistakes are being made in the football match by us, by me, by referees.

And it's good that they acknowledged the mistake but I think it was so clear.

What I said yesterday that so many pundits that are not Liverpool fan.

All of them were clear about it as well so good that they acknowledged it and let's go on to Sunday.

I should also have it.

Obviously I said have to have complaints about the goal and potential outside, but at the same time it seems to be that that's more the way the law is written rather than a mistake by VA are.

Yeah.

Yeah, I agree because I conceded a goal like this when I was at Feynod against Adelaidec Madrid.

Actually, then the Leiseman raised his flag, but then VR interfered saying,

yeah, but the player that was off-side didn't interfere with the situation.

I disagreed with that completely.

As I said yesterday, I disagreed with the rule because I don't like the rule.

Now, okay, it was in a moment where Everton were playing in a low block, but most teams that

are offensive want to have a high press, they want to go to the halfway line to play some

players in an offside position and then when the goalkeeper kicks it long, Virgil and I will go for a jewel with a player that's in an off-side position. And then when the goalkeeper kicks it long,

Virgil and I go for a duel with a player that's an off-side position.

...