Anna, what would you take on the game?

Nothing good comes from losing a game of football.

But if I have to take the positives, there were definitely a few positives.

So dominating ball possessions, Stanford Bridges is not what many teams do over here

because Chelsea is so comfortable with the ball as well. Being 2-0-0-down, don't give up, try to fight yourself back into the game.

That's what we did.

We got already two big chances which we didn't score.

Damn, Chelsea was on a counter-attack a few times, very threatening.

And then when we scored the 2-1, you were like, let's see if there's something in it,

but I don't think there was a moment where we were close to

scoring a goal and then the end,

a correct penalty being given and Chelsea won at 3-1.

So maybe the opposite from the home game,

where they dominated position and we won.

Now it was the opposite.

John McPherson?

I mean, the difference Dominant made when he came on.

Sometimes it feels like your pressing relies on him.

Do you think in hindsight that perhaps it was the middle,

midfield that you lost the game in the end?

I feel like how he struggled a little bit?

No, it's never about one player.

...