I just wanted to go back to the weekend and some of the goals that have been awarded.

I just wonder if you are going to seek any clarification from the PGMOL as to what should and shouldn't be awarded as a goal in these situations.

I'm thinking of the Forest first goal.

I'm thinking of Arsenal's second goal against Spurs and comparing it to what you faced on

about this allowed at Manchester City?

If we would have had clarification about all the decisions that went against this season then

probably didn't have time to manage our team anymore.

But to be fair, I found the first goal we concede against Forest a goal.

So that's the one I saw. I also saw the one at City.

For me that's also a goal.

And I didn't see the game from Arsenal, so I cannot tell you anything about that.

At the same time, when there's inconsistency in those decisions,

you need clarification from the authorities

to what shouldn't have gone your way? Yeah, and sometimes this happens, but I think Howard Webb was

also on television, wasn't he? When he said it was not unreasonable to disallow our goal. So

everybody has his opinion about it. Of course, I have my opinion about it, which is,

although I think I can just look at it in a normal way, but maybe I'm a bit biased because I'm a Liverpool manager.

But like I said, the first goal that Forrest scored this weekend for me, I didn't have that

much problem with it being allowed. The only thing is if your goal is disallowed two weeks before, but I think I was quite clear on the fact that that should have been a goal. It would have been a bit weird for me to say that this goal should have been disallowed then. I didn't think I'd be asking this question after the clinches again to ask them, Bill and Villa and then you're obviously built on that with a performance against Real Madrid

where we guarantee us all solidity and resilience from this side.

So how much is confidence an issue for your players now?

I think still now it hasn't been an issue.

...