Ariana and Sandoval Respond

The Bravo Docket

The Docket, LLC

News, Tv Reviews, Entertainment News, Tv & Film

4.8 • 2.3K Ratings

🗓️ 1 May 2024

⏱️ 42 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this episode we dropped what we were planning to record (we will get back to Marco Marco we promise!) and stayed up late to record an episode on Ariana and Sandoval's responses to Rachel's lawsuit. We give our commentary and explanations as we go through the pleadings, and we are planning on another episode to discuss Ariana's SLAPP motion.

Access additional content and our Patreon here: https://zez.am/thebravodocket

The Bravo Docket podcast, the statements we make whether in our own media or elsewhere, and any content we post are for entertainment purposes only and do not provide legal advice. Any party consuming our information should consult a lawyer for legal advice. The podcast, our opinions, and our posts, are our own and are not associated with our employers, Bravo TV, or any other television network. Cesie is admitted to the State Bar of New York. Angela is admitted to the State Bars of Texas, Kansas, and Missouri.

Become a member at https://plus.acast.com/s/thebravodocket.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	And Hi, I've Hi everyone welcome back to the Bravo docket. We're again diverging from what we
0:30.7	planned to record to provide a quick episode on Tom and Ariana's response to Rachel's
0:39.0	lawsuit.
0:40.0	They've both responded.
0:41.0	Yes.
0:42.0	So Ariana filed a declaration citing California's anti-SLAP law, which if you've
0:47.6	listened to our podcast, you know we've done multiple episodes on California's anti-SLAP law. Well, she actually filed the anti-SLAP law.
0:53.0	Well, she actually filed the anti-SLAP motion and then the declaration attached to that.
0:58.0	Yeah.
0:59.0	And then Sandoval filed a motion to strike portions of Rachel's lawsuit that addressed the way the explicit video was obtained.
1:08.0	He filed a demur.
1:10.0	No.
1:11.0	A demur is the same as a motion to dismiss.
1:13.4	Okay, we don't use that term in any of the states or I practice.
1:16.7	No, I know.
1:18.0	It's a special California term.
1:20.1	I think they use it in Virginia too, but none of the states that I'm licensed and use that term.
1:25.1	Yeah, I don't think he's seeking to strike anything though. I think he's just seeking to dismiss the lawsuit and then
1:30.0	so is Ariana through her anti-SLAP motion.
1:32.6	Is Sandoval's motion, would it be a complete dismissal of the lawsuit or just portions?
1:37.0	I mean, it depends on what he's.
1:38.6	So he think he's seeking to dismiss every cause of action,
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Docket, LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Docket, LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.