Are the Treasury & the MOD at war?
Coffee House Shots
The Spectator
4.4 • 2.2K Ratings
🗓️ 14 April 2026
⏱️ 11 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
George Robertson (pictured), a former defence secretary and former NATO secretary-general, has accused the government of 'corrosive complacency' towards defence, which puts the UK 'in peril'. This is all the more stinging because the Labour peer was one of the authors of the government's Strategic Defence Review – and that makes two of the three who have since criticised it.
How much trouble does this spell for Starmer? And is this just the latest battle in the ongoing war between His Majesty's Treasury and the Ministry of Defence? Megan McElroy speaks to James Heale and Lucy Fisher, Whitehall editor of the financial times and who broke the story.
Produced by Patrick Gibbons and Megan McElroy.
Become a Spectator subscriber today to access this podcast without adverts. Go to spectator.co.uk/adfree to find out more.
For more Spectator podcasts, go to spectator.co.uk/podcasts.
Contact us: podcast@spectator.co.uk
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello and welcome to Coffee House Shots, the Spectator's Daily Politics Podcast. I'm Megan McElroyd, and I'm joined |
| 0:09.5 | today by Lucy Fisher, Whitehall editor at the Financial Times, and James Hill, our deputy |
| 0:13.9 | political editor. So Lord George Robertson is the author of the Strategic Defence Review, and Lucy, |
| 0:19.9 | he's made a pretty major intervention in the |
| 0:21.8 | FT. As you put it, he's run out of patience on military spending. Can you tell us a bit about |
| 0:26.5 | what's happened? Of course. So, Megan, Lord Robertson was asked by the government to review the threats |
| 0:33.3 | facing the UK and indeed the capabilities needed to try and modernise and frankly overhaul |
| 0:40.8 | what all parties sort of now agree are a hollowed out British military. He reported last June with |
| 0:48.5 | his blueprint of what the UK needed to do. And of course he has a lot lot of credibility, not only as a Labour, former defence |
| 0:56.2 | secretary, but as a former general secretary of NATO, the entire alliance. So a very trusted figure. |
| 1:04.0 | And essentially, since then, the government promised to come forward with a 10-year plan on how it was |
| 1:09.7 | going to fund defence, first in the autumn. |
| 1:12.4 | It's been repeatedly delayed. And now we're into sort of spring. We're still not seeing it. |
| 1:17.7 | And last week, John Healy even refused to rule out that this could run into the summer. |
| 1:22.8 | So as you point out, I think George Robertson, who has tried to work constructively behind the scenes with the government to overcome the impasse on how defence will be funded, he finally ran out of patience and decided to make this really hard-hitting attack, both in an interview with the Financial Times and in a speech in Salisbury on Tuesday, |
| 1:49.5 | in which, you know, he warned that the government is guilty of corrosive complacency towards defence, that the UK is under attack and in peril, in a stinging rebuke of Starrmer's military policy, |
| 1:56.7 | and in particular having a bit of a go at what he called vandalism by non-military experts in the |
| 2:02.9 | Treasury. James, do you think part of the bigger picture here is the government can't agree on how |
| 2:06.7 | to fund anything? It's clearly a pretty big problem for us, especially given that we've just |
| 2:11.0 | had the news that the UK has been hit with the biggest IMF downgrade. Well, that sort of sums |
| 2:15.0 | it up. Every time the government tries to plan budget properly, |
| 2:19.7 | one of a number of things happen, either, as you've just alluded to, their, events intervene |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

