Are the Logic Games Changing Forever? (Ep. 355)
Thinking LSAT
Nathan Fox and Ben Olson
4.8 • 868 Ratings
🗓️ 20 June 2022
⏱️ 86 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Love ’em or hate ’em, LSAT logic games—as we know them—are not long for this world. While the future of the games is uncertain, some June test takers were given a sneak peak at possible changes to come. Nathan and Ben discuss the lawsuit that prompted redevelopment of the LSAT’s Analytical Reasoning section and reminisce about the old days of paper testing. The guys then debunk an LSAT myth in another episode of Pearls vs. Turds. They share a helpful tip from a TED talk. And to wrap up, they answer listener questions about grad GPAs, résumés, and diagnostic tests.
As always, if you like the show and want to get more from the Thinking LSAT community, check out the links below. You can connect with other folks studying for the LSAT and get more useful resources from Nathan and Ben.
08:11 - Are the Logic Games Changing?
43:12 - Pearls vs. Turds
46:47 - A Tip for Getting Straight A’s
52:51 - Building Your Law School Résumé
1:06:08 - Diagnostic Test
Read more on our website!
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello and welcome to episode 355 of the Thinking Elsap podcast. |
| 0:12.0 | I'm Van Olson, that's Nathan Fox, together where the co-founder is of El-Sat Podcasts. On Van Olson, that's Nathan Fox, together |
| 0:14.1 | where the co-founder of El-Sat Demon.com |
| 0:16.6 | and the El-Sad Demon Daily Podcast. |
| 0:19.6 | Email us at Help at thinking El-Sat.com if you have any comments on today's show we're going to |
| 0:25.6 | record the next show tomorrow so emailing us today is ideal and we talked about a lot of things some things that may make you guys |
| 0:35.9 | upset we talked about the June L-Sat that just happened there was an experimental |
| 0:42.3 | section that the L-SAC, the |
| 0:44.7 | L-SAC, the test writers told everyone would be experimental during the test and |
| 0:49.3 | then that led to us speculating about why they did that and why they added this section |
| 0:56.3 | we think has to do with accommodations but we talked about that we talked about |
| 1:00.4 | logic games and how they've been and where we think they're going. Any of this. What else do you think people might want to email us about? |
| 1:09.0 | I think mostly that discussion about the you know they're they're apparently making some changes to the logic games coming up I mean this isn't new |
| 1:18.2 | We know that they they entered into this agreement because they settled a lawsuit and the old logic games have to go away because |
| 1:26.8 | Apparently they are discriminatory against blind people. I don't really think that that's necessarily true, but that's, you know, what happened in that lawsuit. |
| 1:37.3 | I want to make it clear that we want to learn about these issues. |
| 1:41.0 | I especially have a tone sometimes that makes it sound like I think I know |
| 1:45.4 | everything and I assure you I'm willing to change my mind about things so email us |
| 1:51.6 | help at thinking else at.com and you can actively contribute to this |
| 1:56.2 | discussion because if you you know day one when this comes out Monday June 20th if you email |
| 2:01.4 | the show tomorrow we will get it, we'll put it on the agenda, |
| 2:05.4 | we'll talk about it and next week's episode we'll have you know your input. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Nathan Fox and Ben Olson, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Nathan Fox and Ben Olson and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.