meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Thomistic Institute

Are Right and Wrong Just a Matter of Opinion? – Prof. Steven Jensen

The Thomistic Institute

The Thomistic Institute

Catholic Intellectual Tradition, Catholic, Thomism, Society & Culture, Religion & Spirituality, Catholicism, Philosophy, Christianity

4.8873 Ratings

🗓️ 11 March 2026

⏱️ 50 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Prof. Steven Jensen argues that right and wrong are not just a matter of opinion by defending moral realism over moral relativism, showing that moral truths are grounded in human nature and goals rather than mere subjective attitudes.


This lecture was given on November 13th, 2025, at Fordham University.


For more information on upcoming events, visit us at thomisticinstitute.org/upcoming-events.


About the Speakers:


Steven J Jensen holds the Bishop Nold Chair in Graduate Philosophy at the University of St. Thomas, Houston, where he teaches in The Center for Thomistic Studies. His fields of research include bioethics, moral psychology, the philosophy of Thomas Aquinas, human nature, and natural law.


Keywords: Argument From Disagreement, Flat Earth Example, Human End and Purpose, Moral Objectivity, Moral Realism, Moral Relativism, Rationalization and Desire, Right and Wrong, Thomistic Moral Theory

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the Tumistic Institute podcast.

0:06.0

Our mission is to promote the Catholic intellectual tradition in the university, the church, and the wider public square.

0:12.0

The lectures on this podcast are organized by university students at Tumistic Institute chapters around the world.

0:19.0

To learn more and to attend these events, visit us at

0:21.6

to mystic institute.org.

0:23.6

It is very alive, I think, in our culture today, that there's widespread belief that

0:30.6

there really is no such thing as right and wrong.

0:33.6

It's a title, the term I'm going to give to it is moral relativism. And it's going

0:42.3

based upon a distinction between what's in the mind and what's in reality as I have laid out here.

0:52.3

So if there's a tree out there in reality, and then inside your mind, in a sense there's

0:59.7

a tree, obviously there isn't literally a tree inside your mind, but there is some likeness,

1:04.8

some awareness of the reality that's out there.

1:07.7

So you have these two things, what's in the mind and what's in reality.

1:13.6

But they don't always correspond. You could have something in the mind, such as a unicorn,

1:19.6

that doesn't correspond to anything outside there in reality.

1:25.6

So with this idea in mind, between there are things out there in reality that we can

1:30.7

know and then things in our mind that don't correspond in reality, we can get a picture

1:36.6

of what moral relativism claims.

1:39.3

Moral relativism claims that moral ideas like right and wrong are like the unicorn.

1:46.0

They're really just in our minds. They're not in reality.

1:50.0

So an example would be, so the unicorn is not out there in the mind.

1:56.0

An example would be, so one man kills another man, that's what's going on in reality the person is aware of it

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Thomistic Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Thomistic Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.