La La La La La, La,

La, La, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh. La La La La La La, show, friends. I am Greg Kokel, your host, and the show is Stan to Reason.

And thank you for joining me, being a part of what we're doing here today.

And this hour is going to be open mic calls, which means I will be taking calls that you leave on a

recording on our website. Usually, you can also call it in, but we prefer you go to STR.org,

to our homepage under podcast. You'll see a live broadcast, go to that,

drop down, and then follow the prompts. And you can leave a question. And it'll get in the queue,

and then eventually, well, we'll get to it. And that's what I'm doing today. So I have a series of questions that,

and I think the first two, I might be mistaken about this, but the first two from an atheist

or a non-believer, yeah, Amy's giving the nod there. So knowing that will factor into the,

oh, okay, she says, not sure if he's an atheist, but certainly I'm not believer.

And which is fine, glad to have those kinds of questions.

If a person is an atheist, and I know that, that means that – and I talked about this – I've talked about this in the past, the notion of entailment that is certain ideas, points of view, worldviews, entail other things of necessity as a natural part of that worldview, even though it may not be expressed.

And a lot of people don't understand that.

And so if there is an atheist who is then complaining about something that is immoral, then

my question is going to be, how could something be immoral if there is no God?

Because it seems that if we're just

molecules in motion, materialistic understanding of the universe, and that's where most atheists

are at, then there is no grounding, no place for, no coherence to the notion that there

are objective moral obligations that one can apply

to, say, Christians who they think are acting in an immoral way or a God who is immoral.

Anyway, that won't be the factor here, I guess, when I get to the question, but we'll see

...