meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Practical Stoicism

Are Personality Types Helpful To Stoics?

Practical Stoicism

Evergreen Podcasts

Philosophy, Society & Culture

4.8662 Ratings

🗓️ 8 March 2024

⏱️ 13 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Greetings, listeners. It's remarkable to witness our community's growth, now exceeding 100,000 listeners every Monday and Friday. Your continued support is truly appreciated. Today's episode delves into a thought-provoking query posed by Griff, a dedicated listener and Patron, regarding the relevance of personality types within the context of Stoicism. Griff questions whether such classifications confine individuals rather than foster personal development. From my perspective, I maintain a degree of skepticism towards these systems. They often serve as tools for self-indulgence rather than avenues for genuine self-improvement. However, I do recognize their practical applications. They can provide valuable insights into our behaviors and guide therapeutic interventions. While these systems may offer useful insights, it's crucial not to allow them to define us. Instead, we should view them as tools for self-reflection and growth. Let's utilize them wisely, not as rigid identity markers, but as resources for enhancing our understanding of ourselves and facilitating personal development. -- Become a Patron: https://stoicismpod.com/members Pre-order my book: https://stoicismpod.com/book Podcast Artwork by Randy Johnson: https://originalrandy.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Most of our media are owned by a handful of tech billionaires, but there's one place that still operates like the internet was never invented.

0:10.4

On the new season of the divided dial from On the Media, we're exploring shortwave radio, where prayer and propaganda coexist with news and conspiracy theories, and where an existential battle for the public airwaves is playing out right now.

0:26.2

Listen to On the Media wherever you get your podcasts.

0:46.9

Music Good morning, Prakaptan. Hard to believe that as of yesterday, there are officially over 100,000 of you out there listening every Monday and Friday,

0:56.7

speckled all over the world, I might add, in over 170 countries. So I wanted to take just a

1:03.2

moment ahead of today's episode to say thank you, to all of you, and also to say thank you

1:08.4

to this week's newest patrons. Thank you to Ryan Eldon, Isaac Murray

1:14.4

Stark, Aaron, and re-pices, which reminds me of my favorite candy. Reeses PCs. Ooh, actually,

1:22.1

it's a close second to Almond Joy or Mounds bars. That's probably going to start quite a debate in the discord.

1:28.5

But gosh, I love those candies. What are your favorite candies? This has nothing to do with stoicism.

1:32.8

Let's move on. Thanks to each of you for becoming patrons of this podcast. Your $5 a month adds up,

1:38.5

and your support makes it possible for me to continue to do this podcast and everything else I do full-time. If you'd like to

1:45.1

become a patron because you're not one already, you'll get rid of ads, support a creator you

1:49.3

care about, and gain access to a few other perks by going to stoicismpod.com forward slash

1:55.4

members and signing up. Today we have a topic that had me salivating the moment it was suggested, and it comes

2:02.4

from listener and longtime patron Griff. Griff writes the following. Is there any use for

2:10.4

personality types slash labels within stoicism? For example, the enneagram scale used for assigning numbers to people based off their

2:19.6

personality traits. Personally, I find myself being frustrated when it comes up as it feels like

2:25.5

the use of a social tool like this would only serve to put somebody in a box, either giving the

2:32.1

person that adheres to the number or traits internally excuses to stay

2:36.7

the way that they are without changing even when some traits are less than ideal, or giving someone

2:42.9

a definition of someone that they have a relationship with without fully getting to know them.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Evergreen Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Evergreen Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.