Antievolution Legislation Shows Descent with Modification
Science Quickly
Scientific American
4.4 • 1.4K Ratings
🗓️ 18 December 2015
⏱️ 3 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is Scientific Americans 60 Second Science. I'm Steve Mursky. Got a minute? |
| 0:07.0 | Creationism evolves and sometimes those new strategies succeed. |
| 0:11.0 | Nicholas Matzky, an evolutionary biologist currently on a fellowship at the Australian |
| 0:16.0 | National University in Canberra. |
| 0:18.3 | So I think a lot of people, it might not have been on their radar that we have two states that |
| 0:22.4 | have a statewide policy that |
| 0:24.2 | encourages teachers to introduce sort of false criticisms of evolution and it also |
| 0:29.0 | more explicitly prides to prevent administrators from doing anything about it if they have a |
| 0:34.0 | teacher that's doing this kind of thing. |
| 0:36.5 | Those states are Tennessee and Louisiana. |
| 0:39.1 | Matzky used to work for the National Center for Science Education, the NCSE, which tracks these legislative efforts to get religiously motivated creationism and its thinly disguised offshoots like intelligent design into public school classrooms. |
| 0:53.7 | Matski and the NCSE were involved in the Kitzmiller versus Dover case in Pennsylvania |
| 0:59.1 | in which the judge found the inclusion of intelligent design in the biology curriculum to be a violation of the First Amendment. |
| 1:06.0 | December 20th marks the 10th anniversary of that decision, but dozens of similar bills that do not explicitly mention creationism or intelligent design have been proposed since. |
| 1:17.0 | Over the years, I had kept in touch with NCSC people and we had always talked about, you know, we're like these bills that look like they're just being copied and modified, you know, we should we should do a phylogeny at some point, you know, do an evolutionary analysis of them. |
| 1:30.5 | So we've gotten up to being about 60 bills. |
| 1:33.2 | I took all those bills, lined up all the texts, coded all the characteristics, all the variations |
| 1:39.8 | between these texts, and then ran them through the standard phylogenetic analyses that we use for |
| 1:45.4 | DNA, we use them for dinosaurs, they get used to study virus evolution, those same programs |
| 1:51.6 | can be used on texts that have been copied and modified. |
| 1:54.6 | Matsky's tongue in cheek or rather Pandas thumb in a creationist's eye analysis |
| 2:00.3 | is in the journal Science. It reveals a high degree of relatedness among the bills. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Scientific American, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Scientific American and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

