meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Philosophy Bites

Anthony Grayling on Atheism

Philosophy Bites

Nigel Warburton

Education, Philosophy, Society & Culture

4.52K Ratings

🗓️ 30 July 2007

⏱️ 13 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Is belief in the existence of a God or gods the equivalent of believing that there are fairies at the bottom of the garden? Or can it be defended on the basis of reason or evidence? In this interview for Philosophy Bites  Anthony Grayling gives a philosophical defence of atheism and explains why he believes it to be a well-grounded and ultimately life-affirming position to hold.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is a philosophy bites with me David Edmonds and me Nigel War Burton

0:06.8

philosophy bites is available at www philosophy bites. com

0:11.0

A.C. Graling is an author so prolific that the suspicion in the philosophy world is that he runs a secret team of underlings

0:19.1

churning out essays, reviews and books on his behalf.

0:22.7

Never want to duck controversy, he's a prominent public intellectual,

0:26.2

commenting as a philosopher on an extensive range of issues.

0:30.4

A recent book is entitled Against All Gods.

0:34.0

That gives a subtle clue to his uncompromising stance on religion.

0:38.0

Anthony, welcome to Philosophy Bites.

0:41.0

We're focusing on atheism for this discussion and I just

0:44.7

wondered if you could give a brief definition of what you understand by that.

0:48.4

Well atheism is a rejection of the idea that there are gods or supernatural agencies in the world of any kind,

0:56.9

even a rejection of the idea that there might have been supernatural agencies at some early

1:01.5

point in the universe's history, which is what deism says.

1:04.6

I don't actually like the term very much, although I am an atheist.

1:07.8

I don't like it for this reason.

1:09.2

It looks as though there is something worth denying the existence of.

1:13.0

And I much prefer the term naturalist.

1:15.0

It means somebody who thinks that the universe

1:17.2

is a realm of natural law, one

1:19.3

where the concepts of physics and chemistry really apply and describe what there is in this universe of ours.

1:26.3

Is that consistent with agnosticism?

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Nigel Warburton, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Nigel Warburton and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.