Yeah, I'll have a few questions for you just on your knowledge of what's going on, but I'm here to answer your questions.

Let's do it.

So you've been traveling around on what you call the Gideon 300 tour and I wanted to start with just your sense of the purpose of the tour,

what are the issues that you're trying to address with it,

and how would you describe the Gideon 300 strategy?

I would describe it as

a necessary civics training in part because the public trust with respect to our elections is so

irretrievably broken.

And one of the ways that you restore trust is by having transparency

and especially in your discussions with people

that administer your elections.

And when you've got arbitrary time limits, for instance,

where you're given three minutes to articulate a concept most people would submit to the fact that

you're not going to be able to discuss all of the myriad of deviations that we've seen over

the past four years in a three minute sound bite.

One of the frustrations from citizen auditors, citizen journalists is that when they try to have a more robust conversation

by placing it on an agenda where you could have an hour or two hours

uniformly those requests were being denied and typically what happens is the machine

company vendors provide talking points they're not accessible and so the

Gideon 300 strategy is basically a citizen attempt to have accountability to make sure that people are confronted over Mel administration ifadministration if they're confronted over things that are being found.

And so I see it as consistent with the First Amendment where we're all lawfully able to assemble and

declare our grievances.

...