Analyzing ICE Shootings

Advisory Opinions

The Dispatch

News, Government, Politics

4.7 • 4K Ratings

🗓️ 27 January 2026

⏱️ 62 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Sarah Isgur and David French discuss the differences between the fatal shootings of Renée Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis and invite Orin Kerr, professor of law at Stanford Law School, to talk about judicial and administrative warrants. The Agenda:–Comparing the two ICE shootings–Supremacy Clause and federal cases–Fourth Amendment rights–Racial gerrymandering in Texas–Answering our favorite listener’s question Show Notes:–Supremacy Clause Immunity, Explained Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings—including access to all of our articles, members-only newsletters, and bonus podcast episodes—click here. If you’d like to remove all ads from your podcast experience, consider becoming a premium Dispatch member by clicking here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Ready?
0:02.0	I was born ready.
0:04.0	Welcome to advisory opinions. I'm Sarah Isgert. That's David French. We are going to break down
0:23.8	the legal differences between these two shootings in Minnesota. If you didn't listen to our
0:28.9	previous episode on the Renee Good shooting, that may help you, but if not, jump right in.
0:33.8	Then we will have a special guest talk to us about the Fourth Amendment issues all up in this
0:40.0	business. Judicial versus administrative warrants and Fourth Amendment remedies.
0:45.0	There aren't many. And finally, we'll talk about that dissent from Judge Lee in the California
0:52.0	mid-cycle redistricting case, as well as many of the great,
0:56.4	great answers to nine-year-old Claire's letter, nine-year-old Claire, who wants to be a lawyer.
1:02.1	All this and more on advisory opinions.
1:06.3	This episode of advisory opinions is brought to you by our friends at Pacific Legal Foundation.
1:11.6	Since they were founded in 1973, PLF has won 18 Supreme Court cases defending the rights of ordinary Americans from government overreach nationwide,
1:20.6	including landmark environmental law cases like Sackett v. EPA.
1:24.6	Now PLF is doubling down and launching a new environment and natural resources
1:29.5	practice. They're on a mission to litigate cases that make more of America's land and resources
1:34.6	available for productive use and to make sure freedom drives our environmental and natural
1:39.6	resource policy, not fear. To learn more, visit pacificlegal.org slash flagship.
1:46.2	Adobe Acrobat Studio so brand new. Show me all the things that PDFs can do. Do your work with
1:51.1	ease and speed. PDF spaces is all you need. Do hours of research in an instant. Key insights
1:56.5	from an AI assistant. Pick a template with a click. Now your Prezo looks super slick.
2:01.6	Close that deal.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Dispatch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Dispatch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.