Hi there, everyone.

It's now 4 o'clock in New York.

The Trump administration today finding itself buried under an avalanche of new revelations

surrounding what it is they're doing in the Caribbean.

News that only fuels the questions and calls for oversight.

The latest blockbuster new reporting by the Washington Post based on the accounts of 10 people

either briefed on or familiar with the September 2nd boat strikes. It reads like a detailed

TikTok of exactly what went down. From that new report, quote, a laser-guided bomb had killed nine of the

11 people on board, sunk the boat's motor, and capsized the vessel's front end. As smoke from the

blast cleared, a live surveillance feed provided by a U.S. aircraft high overhead showed two men

had survived and were attempting to flip the wreckage. The video feed showed that the two

men were struggling to stay atop the flotsam, which people who've seen the footage described as

roughly the size of a dining room table. Admiral Frank M. Bradley turned to the military lawyer

advising him and requested input. Under the law of armed conflict, were the men now

shipwrecked and therefore out of the fight, rendering them unlawful targets. He ordered a second

strike, killing both men. Moments earlier, the video feed had shown them waving their arms and

looking skyward. People who saw the footage said, it was unclear, they added, why they were doing so.

Washington Post goes on to report that Admiral Bradley defended his actions to members of Congress,

but the central question of whether that second strike was legal remains.

Washington Post reports this, quote,

there was dissent in the operations room

over whether the survivors were viable targets after the first strike. What the lawyer advised,

...