meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Waves: Gender, Relationships, Feminism

Amy Coney Barrett Is Following in the Footsteps of John Roberts

The Waves: Gender, Relationships, Feminism

Slate Podcasts

News Commentary, Society & Culture, News, Sexuality, Health & Fitness

4.2903 Ratings

🗓️ 8 July 2021

⏱️ 36 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On this week’s episode of The Waves, Slate Supreme Court reporters Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern join forces to dissect Amy Coney Barrett’s first term on the bench. They talk about how her confirmation hearings were shaped by Democrats’ desire to paint her as an enemy of health care, and how her recent decision upholding the Affordable Care Act has gotten her outsized praise. Then, they dissect her desire to be seen as an academic rather than a conservative, and unpack what we can expect from her in the years to come.


Recommendations

Dahlia: A Supreme Women Mug from Resistance By Design

Mark: A Washington D.C. statehood tank top from DC Statehood Gifts & Apparel


Podcast production by Cheyna Roth with editorial oversight by Susan Matthews and June Thomas. 

Send your comments and recommendations on what to cover to thewaves@slate.com.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You're listening ad-free on Amazon Music.

0:03.6

This is the waves.

0:05.5

This is the waves.

0:06.6

This is the waves.

0:07.7

This is the waves.

0:08.4

This is the waves.

0:09.5

This is the waves.

0:10.1

This is the waves.

0:14.1

Welcome to The Waves, Slate's podcast about gender, feminism, and the Supreme Court.

0:22.2

Every episode, you get a new pair of feminists to talk about the thing we can't get off our minds.

0:27.8

And today you've got me, Mark Joseph Stern, a staff writer for Slate covering courts in the law.

0:33.0

And me, Dahlia Lithwick, I am a senior editor at Slate, and I cover the courts.

0:39.0

Today we're talking about Amy Coney-Barritt's first term, which just wrapped up this month.

0:45.7

Justice Barrett notoriously replaced Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the court,

0:50.8

solidifying a six to three conservative majority. And today we'll be talking about what

0:56.6

impact her votes had on the cases that the court decided and also the cases that the court

1:03.1

chose not to decide. You know, I'm sitting with two things, and it's sort of interesting to me.

1:09.6

One, last October, November, you and I were running around houses on fire, houses on fire.

1:15.4

She's going to do all these dreadful things.

1:17.6

And two, now we're sitting in the midst of a raft of mainstream media views that Barrett turned out to be really moderate and temperate and centrist, and maybe not all that

1:30.7

different from RBG after all. So maybe just in terms of table setting, were we wrong then or are we

1:37.8

wrong now? I don't think we're wrong at all. Let's recall at Justice Barrett, then Judge Barrett's confirmation hearings, the Senate Democrats chose to make it about the Affordable Care Act.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.