I am so over this situation, Peter. I'm unbumble to find something real. You know, like someone

you can count on, someone who actually cares about what you think. I just want someone

who's ready for that long-term kind of love. Whether you're looking for your next boyfriend,

girlfriend, casual date or just someone who truly gets you, it's waiting for you unbumble.

The watcher of the term for me is arrogance. This is the norm that we have allowed to be

created around this Supreme Court, that it is hands-off, that they are not accountable.

These are not a random set of cases that the justices are deciding. A court that it's

really putting itself at the center of American governance and making itself not simply

a court of last resort for people, but a final decision-maker in the American system.

This is a profoundly arrogant institution. Hey, and welcome back to Amicus for the last

episode of the 2022 Supreme Court term. I'm Diallithic. I cover the courts for slate

along with Mark Joseph Stern, who is joining me for this episode of our storied Supreme

Court breakfast table where we sit down with a bunch of transcendently smart court watchers

to try to make some sense of the entire term that has just wrapped. Hi, Mark. Hi, Dahlia.

And as with all of our opinion pollusa shows this past month, this episode will be available

to all listeners thanks to the generous support of slate plus members who usually get the

bonus content we've been bringing to you all to themselves. Slate plus members will have

access to a behind the velvet rope, ties loosens, cigars, and cognac conversation between

me and Mark Stern later in this show. But for now, we just want to thank our slate plus

members for their support. And to mention that if you'd like to join slate plus, you can

always find out more at slate.com slash amicus plus. But first, joining us for this year's

What Did It All Signify Show are three incredibly sharp thinkers and analysts. Jamel Buie, our former

...