Lessons from The Trump Years for SCOTUS
Slate Daily Feed
Slate
3.9 • 1.1K Ratings
🗓️ 11 March 2023
⏱️ 47 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Dahlia Lithwick is joined by political analyst Michael Podhorzer (ex AFL-CIO, now newly-minted substacker). Michael was one of the all-hands-on-deck responsible for shoring up the 2020 election against subversion, he’s a political data geek, and for Amicus’s purposes - he’s someone with a fascinating take on the Supreme Court, and all the ways we fail to truly understand it. Hear why Michael doesn't care about Leonard Leo, the lessons learned in the Trump years that we should be applying to the court, and the overarching agenda that both motivates and shapes the court’s jurisprudence.
In this week’s Amicus Plus segment, Mark Joseph Stern is away, so Dahlia is joined by the Award Winning™ Leah Litman to talk about loan forgiveness and major questions, the Texas suit being brought by women seriously harmed by the state's abortion ban, and the alarming implications of an amicus brief in an Indiana abortion case that questions the religious sincerity of, well, anyone who backs abortion rights.
Sign up for Slate Plus now to listen and support our show.
Dahlia’s book Lady Justice: Women, the Law and the Battle to Save America, is also available as an audiobook, and Amicus listeners can get a 25 percent discount by entering the code “AMICUS” at checkout. https://books.supportingcast.fm/lady-justice
Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Our site has a rule of law problem because we really have not absorbed that at the end |
| 0:13.3 | of the day the law is where we're going to live. |
| 0:21.2 | Hi and welcome back to Amicus. |
| 0:23.0 | This is Slate's podcast about the courts and the law. |
| 0:25.7 | The rule of law is Supreme Court. |
| 0:27.1 | I'm Dahlia Lithuek. |
| 0:28.1 | I covered those and other things for Slate. |
| 0:31.3 | And since we last met, the justices have heard oral arguments in several cases, including |
| 0:37.1 | one testing whether President Biden's loan forgiveness was constitutional. |
| 0:43.8 | We previewed that case with Mark Stern in our Slate Plus segment last time. |
| 0:49.4 | And Slate Plus members are going to get to hear the post-argument gaming on it later |
| 0:54.6 | on in this show. |
| 0:55.6 | We'll talk about that more in a minute. |
| 0:58.3 | For the main attraction this week, it's been a while since we've talked to someone on |
| 1:02.6 | this show who looks at the court through a really wide-angle lens and who maybe looks |
| 1:08.8 | at the court for the political beast that it is rather than the institution we might once |
| 1:16.0 | have been able to suspend disbelief around long enough to imagine that it is in fact |
| 1:22.4 | not political. |
| 1:23.8 | So this week, we are checking in with one of my personal favorite political analysts |
| 1:27.8 | and thinkers, Michael Podharser. |
| 1:29.9 | He's former political director of the AFL CIO, a long-time political strategist for labor |
| 1:35.8 | unions and the chair of the Analyst Institute, which is a collaboration of progressive groups |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Slate and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

