meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Slate Daily Feed

Amicus: Anita Hill on the Supreme Court’s Future

Slate Daily Feed

Slate

News, Society & Culture, Business

3.91.1K Ratings

🗓️ 12 March 2022

⏱️ 56 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Professor Anita Hill to discuss confirmation hearings past and future, the unfinished work of equality, and whether the current Supreme Court can be part of that work. In our Slate Plus segment, Slate’s senior jurisprudence editor Nicole Lewis and senior writer Mark Joseph Stern discuss the worrying news buried in a shadow docket “win” for redistricting, a unanimous decision Monday, and the judges who seem intent on threatening national security by meddling with the military. Sign up for Slate Plus now to listen and support our show. Podcast production by Sara Burningham. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Changing culture and structures at the same time is hard, but we make gains and they're

0:11.1

incremental and I get impatient and I worry too, but it doesn't stop me from pushing.

0:30.8

Hi there and welcome to Amicus. This is Slate's podcast about the law and the rule of law

0:36.5

and the spring court and the courts. I'm Dahlia Lithwick. I cover those things at Slate.com and we are

0:43.2

in this interregnum between President Joe Biden's announcement of Katangi Brown Jackson

0:51.7

as his nominee to sit on the U.S. Supreme Court and her confirmation hearings that are going to

0:57.3

begin in just a bit over a week. We were trying to think about who our absolute dream pick would be

1:04.8

to discuss this truly historic moment and we just decided to take a flyer and ask Anita Hill,

1:12.4

who in so many many ways is a trailblazer on big big issues around race and justice and accountability

1:21.6

and gender and she said yes and we're going to be hearing from her in just a moment. Later on in

1:28.8

the show Slate Plus members are going to have access to our special extra bonus segment and this

1:35.4

week's Amicus Plus segment is going to feature a conversation between Slate's senior jurisprudence

1:40.5

editor Nicole Lewis. We've talked to her before in Slate Plus and of course my wingman Mark Joseph

1:46.0

Stern who covers the law for Slate and they're going to talk about all the things that are happening

1:50.8

at the court that we couldn't get to in the main show including a shadow duck at near miss for

1:56.6

federal elections and a big unanimous decision in a case concerning the armed career criminal act

2:03.4

that landed on Monday. If you are not a Slate Plus member you can always sign up at slate.com slash

2:09.5

Amicus Plus membership gets you access to lots and lots of cool stuff like ad free podcasts and

2:16.0

never hitting a paywall at Slate and your membership of course supports all the work we do here

2:21.6

at the magazine. Thank you as always for that. So go to slate.com slash amicus plus two sign up but

2:30.0

now professor Anita Hill. So I guess I will just say that Anita Hill needs absolutely no introduction

2:37.9

in 1991 as a young law professor. She testified that Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas had

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.