America's Abortion Laws are Out of Touch with People, Science, and the International Community
Breakpoint
Colson Center
4.8 • 3.1K Ratings
🗓️ 6 April 2022
⏱️ 5 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
New gruesome photos of babies aborted late-term in Washington, D.C, are a reminder of what abortion really is.
For the Colson Center, I'm John Stonestreet. This is BreakPoint.
Last week, D.C. police collected the bodies of five babies that were reportedly aborted late-term. A pro-life activist claims the bodies were given to her by a "whistleblower" from an abortion clinic. The clinic conducts abortions until week 27, but experts contacted by Live Action News believe that one of the babies looks to be between 28 and 32 weeks.
I've seen the photos. They are absolutely horrific. The older baby is simply indistinguishable from a newborn.
With the Supreme Court soon to announce a decision in the Dobbs case, the abortion industry continues to dig in its heels. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization is about the constitutionality of a Mississippi law that limits abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The fact that such a law would be fought, especially at the highest legal levels, is evidence that America's abortion laws are not where people, science, and the rest of the world are when it comes to abortion.
Of course, Christians have additional, sacred reasons for opposing abortion at any age in any circumstance. Even so, despite the alarmism presented in the media and from abortion advocates about any abortion restriction, Americans don't want late-term abortions. A Wall Street Journal poll published last week found that a majority, although slim by 5%, were against abortion after 15 weeks. Another poll conducted last year by Associated Press and the NORC Center at the University of Chicago found that 65% of Americans don't want abortion after the first trimester, ending after week 12 or 13. Additional research shows that millennials lean more pro-life than Gen X.
A major reason public opinion continues to trend toward more abortion restrictions instead of less is due to what we have learned from both natural and social science. Abortion is not the elimination of unformed masses but the killing of babies who, at 15 weeks, are developing eyebrows and eyelashes and can thumb suck and yawn. A survey conducted by pro-life organization Susan B. Anthony List found that when people know the science they are more uncomfortable with abortions past 15 weeks.
For example, 55% of survey takers informed that at 15 weeks a pre-born baby feels pain were "more likely" in support of a 15-week limit. And 53% indicated "more likely" support for a 15-week limit when informed that "by 15 weeks an unborn child has a beating heart, can move around in the womb, can close his or her fingers, can start to make sucking motions and hiccup, and senses stimulation from outside the womb." Also, 52% responded in "more likely" favor of a 15-week restriction when they learned that "abortion carries signific physical and psychological risks to the mother, and these risks increase with late abortions."
This science appears to be convincing much of the rest of the world to restrict abortions closer to the first trimester. Even Chief Justice John Roberts in his exchange with abortion industry counsel during discussion on the Dobbs case noted that, except for China and North Korea, the U.S. seems to be out of step globally regarding the "viability standard." Viability outside of the womb is often thought now to begin at 24 weeks, and some high-tech NICUs' have made is as potentially low as 22 weeks of gestation. Sharing a standard with two of the nations known least for respecting life is not commendable. In fact, a report from the Charlotte Lozier Institute finds that the U.S. is only 1 of 7 nations that allow voluntary abortion past 20 weeks.
As Patrick Kelly of the Knights of Columbus wrote in the Wall Street Journal a few months ago, up to 4,000 pregnancy resource centers are available for expectant mothers in the United States. Despite the criticisms of the abortion industry, Charlotte Lozier Institute in its research of 2,700 centers found that 25% of their paid staff were medically trained. The institute has shared that "consistently high client satisfaction rates reported to pregnancy centers reflect that women, men, and youth who visit centers feel respected, valued, and well cared for." When we advocate for life, we are not advocating for just the life of the baby but also for the life of the parents. They and the baby are both made in the image of God.
If you are interested in "Preparing for a Post-Roe Future," consider attending a special evening event on Thursday, May 12, in Orlando, Florida, before our annual Wilberforce Weekend. This event features Tim Tebow, Stephanie Gray Connors of Love Unleashes Life, Jim Daly of Focus on the Family, Erin Hawley of Alliance Defending Freedom, and Kristan Hawkins of Students for Life. Join us to learn more about advocating for the pre-born, and continuing the struggle to abortion unthinkable.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | New gruesome photos of babies aborted late term in Washington, D.C. are reminding us of what abortion really is. |
| 0:07.9 | For the Colson Center, I'm John Stone Street. This is Breakpoint. |
| 0:12.3 | Last week, D.C. police collected the bodies of five babies that were reportedly aborted late term. |
| 0:18.3 | A pro-life activist is claiming that the bodies were given to her by a whistleblower |
| 0:22.2 | from an abortion clinic. The clinic conducts abortions until week 27, but experts contacted by live |
| 0:28.4 | action news believe that one of the babies looks to be between 28 and 32 weeks. I've seen the photos. |
| 0:35.5 | They're absolutely horrific. And this particular baby is simply indistinguishable |
| 0:40.2 | from a newborn. With a decision in the Dobbs case, soon to be announced by the Supreme Court, the abortion |
| 0:45.0 | industry is continuing to dig in its heels. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization is about the |
| 0:50.7 | constitutionality of a Mississippi law that would limit abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy. |
| 0:56.3 | A positive ruling would lead to similar restrictions on abortion all across America, and even more. |
| 1:02.0 | The fact that such a law would be fought to the highest level is evidence that the abortion industry |
| 1:06.6 | is simply refusing to catch up to where most people, where science, and where the rest of the world are when it comes to abortion. |
| 1:14.2 | Americans do not want late-term abortions. |
| 1:17.1 | A Wall Street Journal poll published last week found that a majority, though slim by 5%, were against abortions after 15 weeks. |
| 1:24.5 | And another poll conducted last year by the Associated Press and the Norke Center at |
| 1:28.5 | the University of Chicago found that 65% of Americans don't want abortion after the first |
| 1:33.7 | trimester. That means week 12 or 13. Additional research shows that millennials lean more pro-life than |
| 1:40.3 | Gen Xers. Now, a major reason public opinion is trending toward more restrictions on abortion |
| 1:46.0 | instead of less is due to what we've been learning from both natural and social sciences. |
| 1:51.0 | Abortions not the elimination of some unformed mass. It's the killing of babies, who at 15 weeks |
| 1:57.0 | are developing eyebrows and eyelashes, can thumb-suck and yawn. A survey conducted by pro-life |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Colson Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Colson Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

