AMA: Do Low-carbers Need Less Vitmain C? Does Omega-3 Supplementation Actually Benefit Us? & More (SNP 27)

Sigma Nutrition Radio

Danny Lennon

Nutrition, Health & Fitness

4.8 • 633 Ratings

🗓️ 19 March 2024

⏱️ 12 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Questions Answered in This Episode:

[01:22] Do "low-carbers" need less vitamin C?
[14.56] If you were to advise a company to establish solid workplace health fundamentals, what would you tell them?
[26.20] Which compounds typically found in animal products would be interesting to supplement for health and performance purposes in vegan/vegetarian populations?
[40.09] In omega 3 supplementation studies it isn't common to see a baseline measurement of omega 3 index. Why?
[44.10] What is your process for preparing for a podcast and choosing topics?
[49.53] Based on the current understanding, what is the most ideal diet for people to eat?
[55.26] Is there any evidence that otherwise healthy people should be consuming Omega 3 supplements?

This is a preview of is one of our Premium-exclusive AMA (ask me anything) episodes, where we answer questions submitted by Premium subscribers.

To listen to the full episode, you'll need to be a Premium subscriber and access the episode on the private Premium feed.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Hello and welcome. You are listening to a Sigma Nutrition Premium exclusive Ask Me Anything episode where I've taken more of the questions
0:22.8	that you premium subscribers have sent in and I've taken a nice collection of these that covers
0:29.3	a range of different topics and hopefully as we walk through these something I say might be of
0:34.8	utility and might be useful to you. Now remember, if you are a Sigma Nutrition
0:39.0	premium subscriber and you want to leave a question for a future Ask Me Anything episode, then you
0:44.6	can do that over on the members area, which you can easily find either through the Sigma nutrition
0:49.0	website or when you are in your Supercast dashboard. in both those places you can find a section to
0:56.1	leave a question or the AMAs. Also there you will see all the previous questions that have been
1:02.0	answered on past AMA episodes. And if you go to any of those particular questions that have
1:08.1	previously been answered, there will be a play button which will bring you directly to the point where they're answered so you can listen back
1:14.0	to the question you are interested in. Let's get down to things because there's quite a bit to
1:18.0	cover and I want to make sure I fit in as many of these questions as they can within the time
1:22.8	allotment I have here. The first question relates to specific claims made around carbohydrate levels in the
1:29.9	diet and vitamin C requirements. And this question comes in from Keene Lynch. A really nice question
1:35.5	and Keen has given lots of commentary which is excellent alongside this. So it's a nice job on that
1:42.0	Keen. But due to the length, I'm not going to read it all
1:44.9	out here, but he's touched on many different issues in this question slash comment. And again,
1:51.5	you can read all these questions in full over on the members area. So you can click through to
1:56.5	AMA section. And if you want to see not only the question, but some more of the additional
2:01.2	material and ideas that Keene has come up with, you can go and do that there.
2:05.6	But essentially, the question centers around a claim that has been made in various
2:10.5	places in the low carbohydrate, zero carbohydrate, carnivore communities, essentially suggesting that they have lower requirements
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Danny Lennon, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Danny Lennon and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.