Alex Murdaugh Appeal: Justices Grill Prosecution on "Rogue Clerk" and Financial Crimes
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
True Crime Today
3.3 • 909 Ratings
🗓️ 16 February 2026
⏱️ 145 minutes
🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
The South Carolina Supreme Court just held oral arguments in Alex Murdaugh's appeal—and it did not go well for the prosecution.
On February 11, 2026, all five justices heard arguments on whether Murdaugh deserves a new trial for the murders of his wife Maggie and son Paul. What unfolded was a masterclass in appellate pressure. Chief Justice John Kittredge didn't mince words, calling former Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill a "rogue clerk" and questioning how a court official could attempt to influence a verdict for personal gain. He pressed prosecutor Creighton Waters on why the state allowed "everything under the sun" when it came to financial crimes evidence, calling the scope "arguably problematic."
Justice George James admitted he was "struggling with the logical connection" between Murdaugh's financial misdeeds and the murders. Justice Letitia Verdin pushed on the limits of motive evidence. And in one memorable moment, Waters tried to invoke the movie "Fargo" to explain Murdaugh's desperation—only for Justice John Few to cut him off: "I haven't seen 'Fargo'—get to the point."
Defense attorneys Dick Harpootlian, Jim Griffin, and Phillip Barber argued that Hill's comments to jurors—telling them to "watch his body language" and not be "fooled"—violated Murdaugh's constitutional right to a fair trial. They also challenged the admissibility of cell phone data, a blue raincoat with gunshot residue never tied to Murdaugh, and the sheer volume of financial crimes testimony.
The prosecution maintained the evidence was "overwhelming" and Hill's remarks were "fleeting." But the justices weren't buying it—at least not easily.
There's no timeline for a decision. But after this hearing, the path forward for either side is anything but certain. This episode breaks down everything that happened in that courtroom—and what it means for Murdaugh's future.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughTrial #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #BeckyHill #DickHarpootlian #CreightonWaters #MurdaughAppeal #TrueCrime #JuryTampering #HiddenKillers
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is Hidden Killers with Tony Brewski. Here now, Tony Brucey. |
| 0:06.1 | The case for oral argument this morning, State v. Murdoch. |
| 0:12.3 | I believe the clerk of court, Ms. Howard, has already instructed to turn off your cell phones. |
| 0:18.6 | If you have not, please do so. The courts in South Carolina |
| 0:23.6 | are open and we appreciate those who are present and here to observe, not participate. |
| 0:31.6 | For those present who are not arguing in this case, please do not disrupt the proceedings. |
| 0:37.5 | Any outburst or disruption will result |
| 0:42.2 | in sanctions for contempt of court. |
| 0:46.3 | As we proceed with the argument, |
| 0:48.2 | just wanna notify council that on the primary argument, |
| 0:53.0 | as you begin your 20 minute allotment, five minutes will be given |
| 0:58.0 | without court interruption. So you'll have five minutes before we jump in with questions. |
| 1:06.0 | It's going to be tough, Jeff. And we'll have to show some restraint to do that. |
| 1:17.0 | At the end of the first issue on the post-trial motion for a new trial based on alleged misconduct of the clerk of court, |
| 1:20.6 | and before we get to the underlying trial evidentiary challenges in that matter, |
| 1:26.0 | we will take a short break and I believe mr. |
| 1:31.1 | Harputlin you're gonna handle the first issue yes we're ready to proceed please |
| 1:35.5 | according to your honor yes sir good morning good morning and as I understand |
| 1:40.2 | your instructions I get five minutes without being interrupted. |
| 1:45.7 | That's right. |
| 1:46.8 | Wow. |
| 1:57.2 | Well, first of all, I want to thank the court for I know what has been a very diligent effort to wade through this record, a six-week trial. And then a post-trial hearing that went a few days with additional two hearings, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

