50 former national intelligence folks who said that what this he's accusing me of is a Russian

plant they have said that this has all the care four five former heads of the CIA both parties say what he's saying is a bunch of garbage. You didn't take any action. You didn't fire anybody. You haven't compensated a single victim. Let me ask you this. Let me ask you this. There's families of victims here today. Have you apologized to the victims? Well, they're here. You're on national television. Would you like now to apologize to the victims who have been harmed by your product? Show them the pictures.

Would you like now to apologize to the victims who have been harmed by your problems?

Show them the pictures. Would you like to apologize for what you've done to these good people?

Mr. Zuckerberg, why should your company not be sued for this? Why is it that you can claim you hide behind a liability shield, you can't be held accountable?

Hey, look, if the FBI, which I still view as a legitimate institution in this country, it's a very professional law enforcement, they come to us and tell us that we need to be on guard about something, then I want to take that seriously.

Did they specifically say you need to be on guard about that story?

No, I don't remember if it was that specifically, but it basically fit the pattern.

The credibility of our top scientists like yourself and the CDC are being undermined.

And until recently, that parts of the administration were calling into question whether people

should even follow basic best practices like wearing masks.

The real kicker is right here on the policy where Facebook says it would remove any content that, quote,

claims the COVID-19 vaccine changes people's DNA.

We just don't know the long-term side effects of basically modifying people's DNA and RNA.

So when Zuckerberg said, quote, basically, the vaccine is modifying people's DNA,

it seems pretty clear modifying is synonymous with changing.

Again, Zuckerberg would be banned from Facebook for saying this.

We have example after example of this administration coordinated apparently, according to a federal

court by your agency, pressuring, coercing social media companies to engage in censorship.

Is that constitutional?

That is unequivocally false.

It's what the emails show.

...