This was a big win in New York State and here's the headlines.

State Supreme Court shoots down quarantine and isolation provision.

This is Section 213.

Now this was a Department of Health section that allowed quarantine for no specific amount

of time for a reason that you don't have to they don't have to prove your stick.

They can put you wherever they want.

So you think about quarantine facilities.

We see headlines of that.

No age.

So we're talking kids.

We're talking elderly and this has been shot down now by three of

representatives in New York.

We have George Borrello, he's a New York State Senator.

We have Chris Teig, he's a New York State Assemblyman and Mike Lawler, also a New York

State Assemblyman.

We have a representative getting off their butts and making things happen.

And let's go to the actual decision.

This is what's the judge in the case wrote as his decision.

He says involuntary detention is a severe deprivation of individual liberty far more

egregious than other health safety measures such as requiring mass wearing at certain

venues.

Involuntary quarantine may have far reaching consequences such as loss of income employment

...