meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Open to Debate

Agree to Disagree: Are Identity Politics a Way to Win?

Open to Debate

Open to Debate

Education, Society & Culture, News, Government, Politics

4.52.1K Ratings

🗓️ 11 December 2020

⏱️ 64 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The public and pundits alike are still processing the most recent election, but this much we know: 2020 marks the most diverse Congress in American history, and President Trump garnered more minority voters in 2020 than in 2016. As Georgia faces two runoff elections, which will determine which party controls the Senate, gubernatorial nominee Stacey Abrams and other voting-rights advocates have focused on identity politics as a way to prevail in the electoral process. Is it a winning strategy? Two experts on race and identity in America sit with Intelligence Squared host and moderator John Donvan to debate. Arguing “YES” is Michael Eric Dyson, an author, New York Times contributing opinion writer, contributing editor of The New Republic, and professor of Sociology at Vanderbilt University. Arguing "NO" is John McWhorter, an author, host of Lexicon Valley, contributing writer at The Atlantic, and professor of Linguistics at Columbia University Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This episode is brought to you by SAP Concurs.

0:04.0

In this economic climate, every business spending moment matters.

0:08.0

There's no room for risks, overspending and inefficiency.

0:12.0

SAP Concurs solutions take you beyond basic automation to help you increase your cash flow,

0:17.0

not your concerns, allowing you to settle employee expenses and invoices efficiently and effectively,

0:23.0

reduce financial risk and save time.

0:26.0

Visit Concurs.co.uk to learn more.

0:30.0

It is the degree to which black people have been systemically denied,

0:34.0

opportunities that other people can take for granted.

0:37.0

And as long as we deny, the lethal limits that are imposed upon black American folk or black folk more broadly,

0:44.0

as a result of the very identities we speak about,

0:48.0

then those identities have to be taken into account.

0:51.0

If your visceral sense of what voting is supposed to be about is sticking your thumb down against white hegemony,

1:00.0

it can distract us from, frankly, the less theatrical sorts of things that really can make a massive difference.

1:08.0

I think that it makes us not have as much imagination as we might always have in trying to make black lives better.

1:15.0

Hello and welcome to Intelligence Squared.

1:17.0

I'm your debate host and referee, John Don Van, and today I am asking this question,

1:21.0

is the appeal to identity politics a way to win elections?

1:26.0

Does such a focus serve beneficially to organize and mobilize citizens whose interests and very presence

1:32.0

in politics tends to get marginalized?

1:34.0

Or does it miss the point that each voter is an individual and membership in a group is but one,

1:40.0

and not always the most important consideration in who that person will vote for?

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Open to Debate, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Open to Debate and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.