Just as Briar is stepping down and who's gonna be his replacement?

Is it gonna be Kamala Harris?

Daniel, this is a gill and I will be here to discuss.

I'm gonna examine whether Mitch McConnell is actually a more effective leader of his party than Chuck Schumer is of the Democrats.

Attorney Marina Medvin is gonna join me. She represents some January 6th defendants. She's gonna talk about a pro-Trump rabbi who was arrested after January 6th.

I'll expose the magnitude of NVIDIA's racial discrimination at Harvard and drawing on the economist Joseph Trump-pater.

I'm gonna try to look at what it is that makes entrepreneurs different than everybody else. This is the Dineshtus who's a podcast.

America needs this voice. The times are crazy and the time of confusion, division and lies. We need a brave voice of reason to understanding and truth. This is the Dineshtus Sousa podcast.

I'm here with my daughter Daniel D'Souza-Gill. I don't really know if she needs an introduction, but let me mention she's the author of the book The Choice, The Abortion Divide in America.

She also has a show on Epic TV called Counterculture with Daniel D'Souza-Gill. You can get it right off the Epic Times app.

We're here to talk about Justice Breyer stepping down. I don't know if that was a surprise, but didn't Breyer say earlier that he was not gonna step down?

Exactly. He had said that he didn't want to make the court political.

That was his reason for not stepping down, but evidently he's now chosen to step down. Now ideologically, this is no big change because it preserves the 6-3 majority, presumably a liberal or leftist is gonna be replaced by another leftist.

Breyer did vote occasionally with the conservatives, but not in any big issue. He was for the vaccine mandate. On Roe vs. Wade, you don't expect him to be going.

Oh no. He'll be voting to keep it.

What do you think is reasoning is for the shift of approach? I think there's been a lot of talk from the left about packing the court. I think that's something Breyer felt like would harm the integrity of the court.

I think in some ways he might have stepped down in order to prevent the left from pushing that continually instead of maybe focusing on filling the seat as opposed to trying to pack the court. Although I don't think packing the court would have worked anyways because Manchin and Sinema wouldn't have voted for it, but I think maybe Breyer felt like he needed to give something to the left.

To diffuse the political pressure for the court packing. Now interestingly, well here's Jen Saki who essentially says publicly that they're going to be limiting the search to basically a black woman, black women.

So identity politics has made its way now to the Supreme Court. And let's think about this for a minute because the court is not a ideologically or demographically representative institution.

It is a creation of constitutional democracy, but its job is to be a check on the democratic majority. And how would you feel if you were on the court but you got the black female seat on the court? I mean, what a disgrace.

Yeah, I mean, I think it would just be it would just make you feel like, oh, I only got this because I was a black woman because they said point blank. You're getting this because you're a black woman. So I think that would be pretty frustrating and also just the fact that I'm sure that people people can get that seat based on their merit, but you know, the left doesn't really care about that.

I saw a tweet today from one of the Obama, Joe Lockhart and he goes Republicans better gear up. He's like, you don't dare to vote against a black woman who's the first black woman in history. So the implication is that somehow our side is intimidated by this precedent of history.

...