That very courteous introduction, alas, how I wish you, true, that I know how to be in

northern leadership, three places at the same time, I had since been limited to one, and then

the porridge is to be up to two places because I went to slightly late.

I also invite, before I start, to thank you for those kind words and true words about

Lord Brighensi Stewart and to have on my own behalf I had pleasure of the circuit

as a legal sector as a referendum there in what was to be the last year of his presidency, as I

joined subordinate slaying, but general school, so let's see them, was in 1987.

And Lord Burkentius Stewart was not only courteous to other members of court, as he was unfailingly nice to the rather

more limited group of Nicholsec, Prism and about two hundred of the time called Sala.

And he was very pleasant to us, and very courteous, and not to which only by me say so, not presidential

in the way that subsequent presidents in Mauritius and such a lot of

and it's very much appreciated so thank you those very nice words about you and I should like to

assesship and so much.

Now, it's obviously importance in the union that it's meant to be up and by the rule of law to have clear lethal language.

White vizance is almost truessence to say that citizen has been from standalone,

which is head downways, and likewise, it is almost self-evident to say that in a judicial

system hands-down rulings that are needlessly obscure, perhaps even belfic, its credibility to all quite rightly be lenient.

So far, so good, so obviously.

But what do we actually mean when we speak clear legal language and credibility of the legal system

or of the EU judicial system?

Who is generating the legal language that needs to be accepted to court?

Justice of the European Communities, I can call it short ad BECJ, that's

...