Hey everybody, Rob Mauer here. Welcome back to Tesla Daily. Hope everybody had a great

long weekend and happy Martin Luther King Jr. Day today as well. We're doing a live episode

today as we've got the holiday. No market action obviously to discuss, but we ended up having

quite a busy weekend with quite a lot of Tesla news. So we'll get into quite a few things

here. We've got an ad campaign attacking Tesla as the title mentions. We've got quite a

bit of news on FSD, sort of a weird situation with Tesla's law firm selection updates from

Nitsa, Gigabirline and Texas, and a few other things as well. So a lot to get through and

I'm excited for that was so today. So we're going to start off with that ad campaign.

I'm sure many people have seen it by now, but over the weekend or maybe on Friday, there

was a full page ad in the New York Times, which this cost more than $100,000. I think

I've seen estimates of like $250,000 for a full page ad in New York Times. And it's criticizing

Tesla. So it says, don't be a Tesla crash test dummy talks about how full self driving,

if it was fully self driving every car, millions of people would die every day, which is an

interesting characterization to make given the fact that obviously FSD is not meant to be

unsupervised, and no one has ever really said that it is. They give some statistics here,

which will walk through in a second, and then basically linked to their website. So it

isn't ad, right? Like they are advertising here, not just criticizing Tesla, trying to

you create interest in this project called the Don project. If we got this website, we

can see that this is started by Dan O'Dowd. Dan O'Dowd is the founder of Green Hill software,

which we'll talk about in a second, but they work in various different areas of software,

including an automotive, which I get will talk more about in a second. But it's kind

of interesting here because the ad is mostly criticizing Tesla for, you know, what they

...