meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
European Parliament - EPRS Policy podcasts

ACP-EU relations after 2020: The end of an era

European Parliament - EPRS Policy podcasts

European Parliament Webmaster

Non-profit, Government & Organizations

4.813 Ratings

🗓️ 16 January 2017

⏱️ 7 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

What will be the relations between the EU and ACP countries after 2020? There is a lot to discuss and it might be difficult for all parties to find convergence of interests.

Source: © European Union - EP

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You're listening to the European Parliamentary Research Service podcast on the ACP-EU relations after 2020.

0:11.9

Political, economic, trade and development cooperation between the EU member states and 78 African, Caribbean and Pacific countries, members of the ACP group is defined by the Cotonou Agreement.

0:23.6

But as this framework agreement is set to expire in 2020, a new relationship has to be designed,

0:29.6

building on the achievements and addressing the shortcomings of the current contract.

0:33.6

The EU's position is expected in 2017, but debate has already started. Stay with us.

0:44.3

Signed at the turn of the new century, the Cotonar Agreement is one of a kind, establishing a comprehensive partnership based on three main pillars, development cooperation, economic and trade relations and political

0:55.4

dialogue.

0:56.5

But the world has changed substantially since 2000.

0:59.7

Challenges such as migration, climate change and terrorism have become more prominent,

1:03.9

while the EU's preferential economic treatment granted to ACP countries is ceasing, except for the least developed ones.

1:11.1

The agreement has already been revised twice to adapt to the challenges of the time,

1:15.1

but now that it's expirate it is getting close, debate on a new framework for EU-ACP relations post-2020

1:20.9

is intensifying. But what's the balance of the current agreement?

1:25.1

According to the European Commission and the European External Action Service, it has

1:29.3

had a positive impact on development, trade and the economy, but its political dimension has

1:34.3

fallen short of its ambitions. For instance, political dialogue has not really contributed to improving

1:39.3

democracy or the human rights record of countries which do not share the same values as the EU on issues

1:45.0

such as LGBTI rights and international justice. And although the African peace facility financed by the EU

1:51.2

has contributed to the mitigation of many regional conflicts, political dialogue has not really

1:56.6

contributed to tackling the root causes of violence. On an economic key, and to comply with World Trade Organization rules, different economic

2:04.2

partnerships have been negotiated between the EU and ACP countries organised in distinct

2:09.3

regional groupings.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from European Parliament Webmaster, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of European Parliament Webmaster and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.