Abortion, Population Control, and Eugenics
Breakpoint
Colson Center
4.8 • 2.8K Ratings
🗓️ 10 April 2022
⏱️ 1 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
This summer the U.S. Supreme Court could overturn Roe v. Wade in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. Part of what the justices will have to consider is a legal principle called stare decisis, which means respecting precedent.
If the High Court wants to respect Roe, especially its deep ideological and legal flaws, it should take into account why Roe was decided the way it was.
Since then, the pro-abortion movement has insisted that abortion is a "women's rights" issue. But in 1973, many Americans, especially elites, believed a now-debunked theory that the world was headed for catastrophe due to over-population. The Supreme Court justices themselves noted in the official majority opinion in Roe v. Wade that this concern, in part, motivated their decision to legalize abortion.
In the Dobbs case, the justices should consider that this part of the legal precedent is a debunked and harmful theory, and therefore should see abortion for what it truly is: an unconstitutional evil.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Abortion's always been about population control. For the Colson Center, I'm John Stone Street with the |
| 0:04.5 | point. This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court could overturn Roe v. Wade in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson |
| 0:09.0 | Women's Health Organization. Part of what the justices have to consider is a legal principle called |
| 0:13.7 | Starry Decisies, which means respecting precedent. If the High Court wants to respect Roe, it should |
| 0:19.4 | take into account why Roe was decided the way it was in 1973. |
| 0:22.6 | Since then, the pro-abortion movement has primarily insisted that abortion is a women's rights issue. |
| 0:28.6 | But back in 73, many Americans, especially elites, believed the now debunk theory that the world was headed for a catastrophic overpopulation. The Supreme |
| 0:38.0 | Court justices themselves noted in the official majority opinion in Roe v. Wade that this concern |
| 0:43.3 | motivated their decision to legalize abortion. So the justices should consider Roe's precedent |
| 0:48.0 | in the Dobbs case, and that the precedent was a debunk theory. And that way we'll see abortion |
| 0:52.7 | for what it really is, an unconstitutional |
| 0:54.8 | evil. For the Colson Center, I'm John Stone Street with The Point. |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Colson Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Colson Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

