A Surprise Episode!
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
The Heritage Foundation
4.5 • 527 Ratings
🗓️ 17 December 2021
⏱️ 47 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Last week your hosts said that you wouldn't hear from them until the new year, but the Supreme Court had different plans. The Justices handed down their decision in the Texas Heartbeat Bill case, declined to take up a Free Exercise challenge to New York's COVID-19 vaccine mandate, and granted several new cases. Zack and GianCarlo unpack those decisions, and then GianCarlo interviews D.C. District Judge Trevor McFadden. Tune in to hear about his fascinating career in law enforcement from police officer, to prosecutor, to DOJ lawyer, to judge. Lastly, Zack quizzes GianCarlo with trivia about the earliest SCOTUS confirmations.
Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.
Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!
Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the court. |
| 0:06.0 | I'm John Carlo Canoparo. |
| 0:07.8 | I'm Zach Smith. |
| 0:09.0 | And welcome to SCOTUS 101, where we break down what's happening at the Supreme Court, what the justices are up to, and other things related to our favorite branch of government. |
| 0:21.0 | Welcome back to another episode of SCOTUS 101. |
| 0:24.1 | I know we said last week would likely be our last episode before our Christmas break, |
| 0:28.2 | but the Supreme Court had other ideas. |
| 0:30.4 | They sure did. |
| 0:31.5 | In fact, the court issued a couple of highly anticipated decisions about Texas's SB8 bill |
| 0:36.7 | and also grants in several new cases. |
| 0:39.6 | Since there haven't been any new oral arguments since our last episode, let's jump right |
| 0:44.1 | into new grants. The justices agreed to hear seven new cases and consolidated two of them |
| 0:49.5 | for briefing an argument. There's Golan v. Sata, which involves an issue about when a child has to be |
| 0:54.9 | returned to his or her home country when that child is involved in an international child |
| 1:00.0 | custody dispute. There's Southwest Airlines Company v. Saxon, where the court will decide |
| 1:05.2 | whether workers who load or unload goods from vehicles that travel in interstate commerce, |
| 1:09.9 | but who themselves do not |
| 1:11.8 | physically transport those goods, are interstate, quote, transportation workers exempt from |
| 1:18.5 | the Federal Arbitration Act. |
| 1:20.6 | Next are the two consolidated cases, which are ZF Automotive U.S. v. Luxhare Limited, |
| 1:26.8 | and Alex Partners v. Fund for Protection of Investors' Rights. |
| 1:31.0 | As Amy Howe over at Skodasblog pointed out, the issues in these two cases are essentially the same as the issue in the Sertronics v. Rolls-Royce case that the justices had agreed to hear earlier this year. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Heritage Foundation, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Heritage Foundation and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

