When you can't quite get the angle, take hands-free selfies with the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5,

stand it up, step back, and your photos are also synced to your Chromebook, ready to edit.

The new Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Chromebook, available on Vodafone.

Good morning, welcome to Axios today. It's Friday, June 24th. I'm Nyla Budu.

Here's what we're covering today. Devastation in Afghanistan.

Plus, a call for solidarity from Asian Americans. But first, today's one big thing. A Supreme Court

ruling expands gun rights. Shocking. Absolutely shocking. That was the reaction of New York

Governor Kathy Hocal, when the Supreme Court yesterday struck down a more than century-old New

York State gun law. The Court said the law, which limits who can carry guns outside the home,

conflicts with the Second Amendment, and the ruling stands to significantly expand gun rights in

the U.S. Jeffrey Rosen is president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, a nonprofit

focused on education about the Constitution, and he's here with more. Hi Jeffrey. Hi, good

to be here. Jeffrey, why does the current New York law conflict with the Second Amendment,

at least according to the six conservative members who voted to strike it down?

According to the Supreme Court, the New York law is an outlier inconsistent with the

history and tradition of gun regulations. Basically, the Court said that only six states

have a system like New York where you have to show a good reason for carrying a gun.

And it's embraced a view that Justice Thomas has long held but didn't seem to have a majority

until now, which is that the Second Amendment is not a second-class right, as Justice Thomas

said. And by basically insisting that you have to look to history to figure out whether regulation

is okay, the Court has signaled a real willingness to take a hard look at gun regulations that many

folks have thought were constitutionally on problematic. What do we hear from the dissenting judges

...