Tadden, it's got the code. It's going to launch.

It's a unit system. I know this.

It's how all the files of the whole park. It tells her everything.

Sir, he's uploading the virus.

The Eagle One, the package is being delivered.

Hello out there on the internet. I am Matthew Galt, and this is Cyber.

I've got a special presentation for today's episode.

It's all about nuclear war and famine.

Here is me from a little bit earlier in the week,

explaining just what you're about to listen to. All right. Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us on

this, uh, this Twitch stream slash Twitter space. I'm Matthew Galt. I'm a journalist at

motherboard who covers nuclear issues among other things. So there's this new study

in nature food this month that's generating a lot of headlines. It's built on the foundation

of decades of research. It's about climate change and the global famine that would have

followed even a limited nuclear exchange. The models are terrifying. They are a terrifying

warning. A limited war between Pakistan and India that uses just 3% of the world's nuclear weapons could kill a third of the Earth's population. Today we're going to talk about this study, its implications, and what we can do to avoid it. And hear with me to have that discussion as one of the authors behind the study, Rutgers University's climatologist Alan Robuck. Robach will lay out what he and his colleagues found in just a moment to help us understand

what actions we should take is also with us, Dr. Ruth Mitchell from the International Physicians

for the Prevention of Nuclear War, and Alicia Sanders-Zackery from the International Campaign

to Abolish Nuclear Weapons.

Thank you all three so much for joining us this

morning, bright and early to talk about news. Happy to be here. All right, Alan, can you...

Great to be here. Alan, can you lay out what's in the study and why it's important?

...