And now for a moment of clarity.

See, the problem is we just categorically cannot take the administration at their word on this, because maybe for that U.S. attorney, that is not a feature of their particular investigation.

But who's to say that the Department of Justice, at Maine Justice, as, you know, the streets would say, Mary McCord and whatnot would tell us, Maine Justice, that's not something they're focused on.

My chief concern here and the questions that I have about this are all centered around the retribution piece of it all. It's centered around the retribution piece of it off.

It's centered around the retribution.

Reed Hoffman is not the first time he has been named.

He is not just someone that gave to this fund, essentially.

He's a big Democratic donor.

The administration has previously put a target on the back of foundations in this country that

have supported what they would call small d democratic efforts this is not in my opinion disconnected

from that and i have questions about how deep the rabbit hole goes i i think alicia for me this

this really boils down to one very simple thing. And I really want folks to understand

what they're looking at it. This is what weaponization of our government looks like. This is

exactly what it looks like. When an appeal court dismisses charges, allegations, whatever,

in a matter, and then the administration, through his Department

of Justice, wants to come and do a wrap-around, pulling her in, E. Jean Carroll, into a legal

effort to go after a nonprofit that, as Simone noted, noted they want to target as they've targeted

others in the past.

Folks, this is what it looks like.

So all the BS you hear from this administration, particularly coming out of this president's mouth,

about how he's been, oh, such a victim and so much put upon.

Well, it's because of your own behavior.

...