And now for a moment of clarity.

And I wanted to not be mired down in what Republicans were trying to do.

I wanted to talk about what Jack Smith did in his investigation, what he found in his investigation.

And that was important because you were the, in my estimation, the perfect repost to what we saw

coming from the attacks by Republicans.

They came with hyperbole, bull, noise, lies, distortions.

And you just like, okay, let's just walk through this.

Did this happen? Yes. Did the president do this? Yes. Was this?

And so that's how you do narrative through questions.

Yeah.

Where I have a little bit of a fall, and we were talking about this before, is the

consistency in the narrative is important.

Yeah.

Because I think the most stunning thing about Jack Smith being in public today was what

Jack Smith said when he was in private.

Yeah.

And that part was what you needed to reinforce, which is what you did.

But I have to say that was not narratively pushed by other Democrats.

They should have pivoted off of what you did and what others like you did to keep that

line of questioning, I don't go on to all this drama

and trying to, you know, show up Republicans. I'm just going to say, hey, Jack, did the

President of the United States do X? And Jack going to go, yes. Did he pressure state officials?

...